"The trouble with Cecil" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the American Revolution Message Board Back to the 18th Century Media Message Board
Areas of Interest18th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Workbench ArticleNot just improving a photo, but transforming it using artificial intelligence.
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 14 Apr 2017 12:12 p.m. PST |
"Cecil C P Lawson's five volumes of A History of the Uniforms of the British Army: it's where I started, back as a kid in the local reference library, hunched over the vast wooden table before the high, glass fronted shelves on a summer afternoon, carefully studying each page of each volume. So I'm quite fond of the reactionary old buffer. And yet … Nowadays, when I look at the murky, scratchy drawings of the later volumes, I'm painfully aware of the imperfections in Lawson's work. But it's not just the haziness of some of the specifics; sometimes there are odd, unaccountable errors of detail too. A few previous posts on this blog have looked at the cavalry-influenced styles adopted by some light company officers of volunteers and militia. In a bid to find models for these among the regular regiments, I've recently been trawling period images, with near zero success. But I did come across one. In William Loftie's album of eyewitness images appears an officer of the 21st Foot or Royal North British Fuziliers in 1801. [Left below. Click to enlarge.] Given the wings and Tarleton (as opposed to a fur cap), this must be an officer of the light company. His jacket bears two rows of closely spaced buttons, extending well towards the shoulders – a good match for that of the Berkeley Volunteers shown here, and a confirmation that such styling was not confined to the auxiliary forces…" Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Supercilius Maximus | 16 Apr 2017 3:13 a.m. PST |
Poor old Cecil was also responsible for the confusion between (a) the sleeved waistcoat worn by British light infantry, and (b) the altered (to single-breasted) regimental coat worn by the 40th Foot, in the della Gatta painting of the Chew House action in the battle of Germantown. A mistake still being made by modern authors. |
|