Help support TMP


"Chariots: Leader and Wingman?" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Action Log

27 Oct 2017 9:11 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: The Phalangitrixes

Beowulf Fezian paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


866 hits since 13 Apr 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian13 Apr 2017 4:59 p.m. PST

Writing in Slingshot 309, Ian Russell Lowell notes that the sources often speak of chariots being allocated in pairs, and notes…

Although limited to the two-dimensional space of the battlefield as opposed to the three-dimensional space of aircraft, it is possible to perceive chariots working in tandem as a wing-leader and a wing-man.

Do you think it likely that chariots operated in pairs, similar to a wing-leader and wing-man?

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP13 Apr 2017 6:30 p.m. PST

I am sure every army that used chariots across the "Ancients" spectrum did their own thing based on a number of variables. It makes sense that chariots would operate in support of each other. It also makes sense that they would not.

Deucey Supporting Member of TMP14 Apr 2017 5:45 a.m. PST

I think the most logical way for them to work is lines. Like ship of the lines. That way they could follow the commanders wishes and not crash into each other.

Swampking14 Apr 2017 1:55 p.m. PST

So, where is his evidence? I agree that chariots must have operated in some form of formations, i.e. 'squadrons'. Pairs? Possible. However, I believe it more likely that chariots operated in larger groups of 5 or more. Why? Because even 'tribes' like the Kashka could field up to 80 chariots, each armed with a bowman. The scanty evidence at Pylos mentions chariots in groups of 5, and the light chariots of various Middle Eastern kingdoms operated in groups of between 2-5.

Frankly, it doesn't make any sense for a chariot to not have a companion on the left and the right. After all, archers can only shoot so fast, therefore, the necessity of protecting a chariots flank and/or rear with a companion chariot(s) becomes obvious. A lone chariot would be prone to attack from the rear, sides, or front – just injure one horse and the chariot is vulnerable. However, operating in groups of 5 or more provides strength, flexibility, and protection.

As to Mr. Lowell's assertions – well, duh, that's stating the obvious. They would have had to operate in some sort of 'unit'.

colin knight15 Apr 2017 5:38 a.m. PST

Groups fits with my imagination. However…just a small thought…when Assyrians started cavalry they operated in pairs. We're they reflecting earlier chariot tactics.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.