Help support TMP


"Gettysburg: Little Round Top Controlled Burn" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Brother Against Brother


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Project Completion: 1:72 Scale ACW Union Army

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian feels it's important to celebrate progress in one's personal hobby life.


Featured Profile Article

Coker House Restored

Personal logo reeves lk Supporting Member of TMP updates us on progress at this Champion Hill landmark.


1,396 hits since 11 Apr 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

zoneofcontrol11 Apr 2017 10:08 a.m. PST

Came across this in the news today and thought I would share. The project to restore things to 1860s conditions at the Gettysburg Battlefield continue this week with a controlled burn on Little Round Top. I heard about this on the radio this morning and found a news clip.

link

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP11 Apr 2017 12:33 p.m. PST

Thanks. Another reason to go back.

14Bore11 Apr 2017 1:01 p.m. PST

It always bothered me that it wasn't kept historically. A few years before the battle farmers cleared it off for firewood

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP12 Apr 2017 7:37 a.m. PST

If you haven't been to Gettysburg in a few years I strongly urge a new visit! They have cleared thousands of post-battle trees and the views and vistas are a LOT different than what we've been used to. Understanding some sections of the battle become much easier now.

thestoneman12 Apr 2017 12:44 p.m. PST

Agree. I was there April 2 and visited the Zeigler Grove area where the old visitors center and the cyclorama were. Amazing changes. They are erecting 4' high stone walls. A little too neatly for my tastes, but like nothing I've seen there in 50 years. I am used to the low, knee high walls and "fences". These walls are intimidating like the one at Fredericksburg. Based on old photographs. Eye opening. Waiting for something to be done on Culp's Hill. I understand it was clear of brush. Nothing but brush now.

zoneofcontrol12 Apr 2017 4:17 p.m. PST

If anybody is looking for an excuse to go to Gettysburg…

The Gettysburg Toy Soldier Show is Sun. 04/23 at the Eisenhower Resort.

Here is a link to the Warhorse Miniatures site with the details listed. Been to 2 or 3 of these and they are fun and worth the trip.

link

John Miller13 Apr 2017 11:44 a.m. PST

Any of you guys with more than a casual interest in the Battle of Gettysburg and who haven't been there in a few years would probably enjoy seeing the improvements, especially those that have been done in the Ziegler's Grove area.

thestoneman: It is my impression that the 4' high stone walls you refer to are part of the commemorative walkway that will run from the cemetery entrance on Taneytown Rd. to Hancock Ave. in the Ziegler's Grove area. I was informed that these walls are not meant to replicate stone walls that were there during the battle. If anyone has any more information regarding these walls I would very much appreciate hearing from you. Thanks very much!!! John Miller

thestoneman14 Apr 2017 1:42 p.m. PST

John Miller. It seems there are several sides to the story of the stone walls.
link
link
The second article supports the higher stone walls (first photo referencing wall "B" on the color map). While the author of the first article is not a fan. As I said in my previous post, they are done too neatly for me. Try and find photos of Meade's HQ area by Gardner. They were used to support building higher walls. Also, you are right, there is some commemoration work being done, but as it is all under construction now and unmarked it is confusing. I hope I have not made it more so.

John Miller14 Apr 2017 6:56 p.m. PST

thestoneman: Thanks for getting back to me. For years I was under the impression that restoring the battlefield to its' 1863 condition was the goal of the Park Service. I thought the stone walls were knee high at the time of the battle, (most of them anyway, of course there could have been exceptions). The appearance of these walls confused me so I asked a Park Ranger at the visitor center desk a few week ago and he informed me that the 4' walls were not necessarily historic to the era. The visitor information desk was crowded so I didn't get to go into details with him at the time and, as a result, I don't know what the Park Service's intention is. I am going to go back to Gettysburg in early May so I will attempt to find out more at that time. I thank you very much for posting those links. It appears we are not the only ones who are confused about this. John Miller

PS: I will let you know by posting my finding here on the TMP site.

Old Contemptibles17 Apr 2017 4:00 p.m. PST

Was at Gettysburg last summer and they are restoring the battlefield. NPS is doing a super job despite budget cu

John the Greater18 Apr 2017 2:16 p.m. PST

I have always been a supporter of the restoration work at Gettysburg and Antietam. There has been some pushback from the folks who cannot stand the thought of a tree being cut. Who knew there were so many Druids interested in weighing in on battlefield restoration.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.