"simplest fun rules for large engagements?" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Aviation Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two in the Air
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleBeowulf paints up some WWII Soviet aircraft.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile ArticleMusings on the aesthetics of tabletop flight...
|
chrach7 | 05 Apr 2017 8:26 a.m. PST |
I'd like to try some WW2 aerial battles for a change and I'm wondering which ruleset to use. I hope to play relatively large battles (the more planes the better) with a ruleset that is not overly complex (please no pre-plotting moves). I'm flexible as to the theatre but ideally the rules would cover Eastern + Western Europe and the Pacific. Thanks in advance for your advice. |
Ed Mohrmann | 05 Apr 2017 9:37 a.m. PST |
John Stanoch's Blue Sky rules are what you want. Originally published as 'Squadrons' and made for the Battle of Britain, John has published separate rules for Russia, the Mediterranean, the Pacific, the heavy bomber campaign in Europe and Europe early war )Poles, French, etc.) I've used these rules to do parts of Midway (Kaga and Akagi's airgroups versus Enterprise and Hornet's AG's, a little over 100 aircraft for each side, with about a third as escorts or interceptors). I've run B-17/B-24 raids on Berlin/German industry with about 72 bombers escorted by 24 fighters and with 32 interceptors. Similar actions in the Med and Russia, although smaller numbers of aircraft (due to limitations of my collection) Good rules ! |
Mako11 | 05 Apr 2017 12:30 p.m. PST |
Yea,I agree. Blue Sky is an excellent choice. |
Bashytubits | 05 Apr 2017 1:04 p.m. PST |
I would suggest the Junior Generals free rules. link Here is an AAR of a scenario I ran with some friends. TMP link |
NKL AeroTom | 05 Apr 2017 9:30 p.m. PST |
Lacquered Coffins Would work great for this, designed with large games and simplicity in mind. There's also a battle report here, the game took about 2 hours with plenty of breaks and banter: TMP link |
ACWBill | 06 Apr 2017 3:25 a.m. PST |
Another vote for Blue Sky series. |
chrach7 | 06 Apr 2017 9:47 a.m. PST |
Where does the name "lacquered coffins" come from? I assume it must reference something that I am unfamiliar with (or it would be a very strange title indeed). |
Ceterman | 06 Apr 2017 7:01 p.m. PST |
Where does the name "lacquered coffins" come from? I read somewhere that it was the nickname for an early Russian AC given to it by Russian pilots. I forget the make of AC but I'm pretty sure it was wooden?… |
NKL AeroTom | 07 Apr 2017 1:03 a.m. PST |
Yep, Ceterman has it right, The Soviet LaGG-3 fighter was named after the designers of the aircraft (Lavochin Gorbunov and Gudkov), but the rumors are that some soviet pilots implied it stood for "lakivovany garantirovany grob" which translates to "guaranteed, lacquered coffin". This was partially due to the perceived poor performance and the large losses suffered in this aircraft, and the fact it was made mostly from wood. Coming up with the name for this WWII air combat game was the toughest naming challenge I have faced so far in my game design career… Eventually I settled on Lacquered Coffins because it was unique, accentuated the dread pilots felt when climbing into their single seat fighters day after day, knowing that any day it would be their tomb, and also because it has an eastern front flavor which I tend to favor for WWII games (our WWII company to battalion level land game is called 'Ostfront') An LaGG-3 fighter:
interestingly enough, the aircraft on the cover of Lacquered coffins is not an LaGG-3, but an La-5 fighter. |
|