Help support TMP


"The BBC's Hollow Crown - major wardrobe malfunction" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in the United Kingdom Message Board

Back to the Medieval Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Bear Yourselves Valiantly


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Elmer's Xtreme School Glue Stick

Is there finally a gluestick worth buying for paper modelers?


Featured Profile Article


2,547 hits since 26 Mar 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Warspite126 Mar 2017 7:01 a.m. PST

I re-played the BBC TV adaptation of Shakespeare's Richard III with Benedict Cumberbatch as King Dickie last night. Seen it before and I had noticed nothing amiss…!

I suddenly found myself growling at the telly when I noticed that Henry Tudor was giving his rousing pre-Bosworth speech to smartly liveried retinue soldiers wearing BLUE AND RED!
In other words, major wardrobe malfunction, Henry Tudor is actually addressing Richard's soldiers.

Over on the other side of the field King Benedict III was addressing a rag-tag collection of men in browns, etc, who were wearing old kettle hats. In other words just the sort of rag-tag army Henry might have led. Good old Beeb got the costumes wrong!

And, while on the subject, the earlier TV dramatisation of Phillippa Gregory's The White Queen novel is good for a background in the politics of the period – with an interesting feminist take on how women may have influenced behind the scenes – but oh dear! Bosworth is fought in a forest (?) and there's snow on the ground, in August!

And, major wardrobe malfunction, there's not a single hat being worn in the interior scenes. In those days you did not go to bed without a hat on. I think the wardrobe budget only extended as high as the actors' shoulders :) :) :)

Patrick R26 Mar 2017 11:44 a.m. PST

Hats have been permanently banned from movies and TV because far too many people complained they couldn't tell who was who.

How generations of viewers got through all those westerns without burning down the studios remains a total mystery.

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP26 Mar 2017 12:04 p.m. PST

How generations of viewers got through all those westerns without burning down the studios remains a total mystery.

It was easy – white hats = good guys and black hats = bad guys.

Jim

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP26 Mar 2017 12:37 p.m. PST

the earlier TV dramatisation of Phillippa Gregory's The White Queen

Has gone down as a landmark in continuity errors and anachronistic material in shot.

BBC Controller of Drama Ben Stephenson called the drama, which was filmed in Belgium, ‘one of the most ambitious series the BBC has made'.

But it was criticised for its historical inaccuracies, with viewers pointing out that the characters ‘had access to Persil' and the presence of ‘zips and buttons on the dresses' and ‘handrails and concrete steps'.

(from : link )

My favourite was the appearance of rubber soled boots…nice.

Warspite126 Mar 2017 4:28 p.m. PST

I seem to recall a tarmac road turned up in The Tudors.

Earl of the North27 Mar 2017 6:20 a.m. PST

Ah the BBC…..reminds me of the Robin Hood 'costumes' which I kid you not, one week included modern camouflage trousers and boots. I think it was the one with the traumatised war veteran burning people alive in churches, apparently they were a little vague on which war he was a veteran of.

They also seemed to raid the wardrobe department every week, usually for different disguises to get through the guarded city gate in every episode.

Trajanus27 Mar 2017 6:53 a.m. PST

Annoying but when you are doing it on beans you have to scrimp somewhere and costumes always seem the first place.

Then again "Vikings", which I bet has more money to spend, although it gets things more uniform, only succeeds in getting it uniformly wrong!

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP27 Mar 2017 11:49 a.m. PST

Yeah – there were a lot of picky comments on The White Queen, stuff that in the past we'd have just accepted because of small budgets. As long as the acting made up for it. The BBC War & Peace with Tony Hopkins was very cardboard sets – but the acting was great so in the end one ignored the wobbling walls.

The White Queen was not, sadly, a masterclass in acting.

Henry Martini27 Mar 2017 5:09 p.m. PST

You're setting yourself up for eternal disappointment if you expect any sort of historical accuracy from TV or movies.

maverick290931 Mar 2017 8:40 a.m. PST

Hollow Crown was severely disappointing. They combined battles, combined characters, Warwick looked completely inaccurate, Edward IV's character is drastically under played, Richard III is drastically over played, Towton was a travesty, and the biggest bastadization of all was they portrayed Warwick dying at Tewskebury… Come on BBC he died at Barnet, a much more significant battle.

All in all, every WotR documentary/movie/tv show has severely let me down. Is it too much to ask for a 10 part miniseries with quality acting and Game of Thrones budget?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.