"Warlord or Perry plastics to go with Hat 28mm?" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Product Reviews Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Book Review
|
D6 Junkie | 18 Mar 2017 7:28 a.m. PST |
I'm painting up some Hat 28mm Prussians. But I'm going to need some Landwher and extras. Which should be the closest size wise to the Hat 28mm stuff. |
nickinsomerset | 18 Mar 2017 8:19 a.m. PST |
I realised I required quite a few Prussians for my little Leipzig project. I came across the Hat chaps and at a super price from Hannants. I will be using Perry for the Guard, Hat for the line and Warlord for the Landwehr. I already have Hat Bavarians and some Hat lt inf, they are slimmer, but fine not mixed in the same units as the others. Tally Ho! |
TheWhiteDog | 18 Mar 2017 11:27 a.m. PST |
Perry is usually a better fit for HaT plastics. Warlord Naps can be a bit chunky. |
nickinsomerset | 18 Mar 2017 2:44 p.m. PST |
Oh, how do you find the Hat chaps? Tally Ho! |
Wolfshanza | 18 Mar 2017 10:58 p.m. PST |
I like the HaT Napoleonics. The El Cid range is another matter :/ Have some painted HaT Prussians up on hatebay right now. |
TheWhiteDog | 19 Mar 2017 6:31 a.m. PST |
Though slimmer, I think the HaT plastics have very nice detail and are incredibly reasonable in price. |
Tony S | 19 Mar 2017 9:58 a.m. PST |
My Prussians are a mix of Perry (line troops), Warlord (Landwehr and their metal jagers) and HaT (skirmishers and fusiliers). The HaT are the smallest of the lot, which, since the Prussians tended to put the smaller men in the fusilier battalions, it works out just fine. I cannot rationalize why the Landwehr are so big and beefy (especially their absolutely massive shovels of hands), but you know what – it all looks fine on the table. If I had to do it all over again, I'd honestly go with HaT. Can't beat the price, and I quite like the figures. I originally sought them out because I was disappointed with the single skirmisher pose from the Perry box. Very glad I did. As I said though, once they are deployed on the table the size differentials don't matter, since I don't mix any of the troops into a single formation. Admittedly, I did put a washer under the HaT figures only, to bump them a bit higher on their MDF base. |
Glencairn | 28 Mar 2017 5:11 a.m. PST |
As a general comment, Alban miniatures fit Hat almost exactly.. |
|