Help support TMP


"Carrying weapons." Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tractics


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

15mm Trucks From Hell

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian struggles to complete his SISI truck force.


Featured Profile Article

Council of Five Nations 2010

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is back from Council of Five Nations.


Featured Book Review


969 hits since 6 Feb 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
UshCha06 Feb 2017 2:34 p.m. PST

We rend ro allow say 1 LAW 72 to be carried by a trooper without him having any restrictions on him, as its realtively light. However if he carries more or heavier weapons we restrict his gun ammo so he can only fire in self defence.

What do you do?

Mako1106 Feb 2017 3:33 p.m. PST

He should be able to carry a rifle and ammo for that, plus a LAW, with no issues.

I suspect, if available, two LAWs could also be carried relatively easily, especially since many troops aren't ever far from their vehicles during the Cold War, so don't have to walk far.

Weasel06 Feb 2017 4:47 p.m. PST

From what I've seen of pictures, the LAW's are pretty easy to carry, they seem to pretty much just be strapped on to your backpack or kit.

Wikipedia says it weighs 5 and a half pounds, so I don't think I'd count a single LAW against a man, though I will admit, we tend to assume that machine gunners and such don't carry them in any event.

Ashokmarine06 Feb 2017 5:29 p.m. PST

Mako is right. It's not heavy but could be a pain to carry more than one.

Lion in the Stars06 Feb 2017 7:50 p.m. PST

I'd say that every trooper with an MG (or SAW) wouldn't carry a LAW, but everyone else could pack at least one (which makes for 6-7 per squad if they're at full strength).

Then again, I wouldn't have the Dragon team packing LAWs in addition to their rifles, they have a bigger AT weapon in the Dragon.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse08 Feb 2017 8:57 a.m. PST

Agree with much posted here. Basically the way we'd issue LAWs was if you were not packing a Hvy Wpn. You'd get a LAW.

As far as game purposes, there should be no real penalty for carrying the 5.5lbs M-72. You'd have to fire while briefly stopped. But then could continue to move. The expended LAW tube would be dropped, crushed and then trooper would than move on.

With the 11 man Mech squad. With 2 being left in the track. The 9 dismounts would be broken down into two 4 man Fire Tms, with 1 SL.

Where the Light Inf Squad like in the 101, you'd have full 11 man Squads.

Regardless, The M60 Ammo Bearer could carry a LAW. As well as the TL or SL. Even the M203 GL & M249 SAW Gunners could carry one in need be. As noted of course the M-47 Dragon Gunner had his hands full just packing the missile and track. And this too is only one shot. And expended tube crushed and left behind.

The one advantage Mech has is it can carry more ammo in the track. However, even Mech troops would do long dismounted movement leaving the track TCs & drivers behind. With the tracks being under the XOs or 1SG command. The tracks would then called to move and link up with the dismounts. Or e.g. for a dismounted patrol, day or night, the patrol could also return to the tracks Defensive location. Once their mission was complete. Ana as always it depends on the terrain & situation.

But as noted, in many cases track was near by. The Light Infantry did not have that advantage. Something else to be aware. Mech still has to do it's job on the ground. You can't be too wedded completely to the track.

E.g., the Russian's doctrine in many case requires the BMP, etc., and the dismounts to remain fairly close. But that again comes down to terrain & situation. If need be if the terrain is not good for vehicular movement. The Infantry will dismount and move on it's own. And link-up with the tracks later.

But again it pretty much depends on terrain & situation.

Gaz004508 Feb 2017 2:40 p.m. PST

In the UK forces we trained with weighted tubes (previously fired and sand weighted), usually with one strapped to our webbing and two more strapped to Bergen's…..we were told to expect to have loads of them if things ever got hot. Like above, only the gpmg gunner was exempt from carrying them……..I recall a pig of a march with 3 tubes,ammo, bergen, sf tripod and a tin of 200 for the gpmg!

Edit- from memory there was a 'carrier' webbing thing that held 4 x66's in a bundle….whether it was official or a local fix? Only saw it a couple of times with our unit.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse08 Feb 2017 3:37 p.m. PST

Yes, especially in Light Infantry units like the 101, 82d, etc. if need be you might hump a few LAWs. Never saw that LAW carrier though, probably was not standard issue ?

And as you noted … with a combat load, there is nothing Light about "Light Infantry" ! But just because you're in a Mech unit. Does not mean you are not going to have to do some long dismounted movements.

For all US ARMY Infantrymen the standard was 12 miles in 3 hours. And at times that could be a very long distance and a very long time.

Charlie 1208 Feb 2017 8:18 p.m. PST

And that's why I went with Tanks! (Although wrestling with a thrown track has an allure all its own…).

Gaz004509 Feb 2017 12:17 a.m. PST

We had an ex-tankie……"Didn't you ever run Jones?"
'No, I had a tank!'

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse09 Feb 2017 3:31 p.m. PST

Having been in both Light & Mech Infantry … they Both have an "allure" … all their own …

Either one … one way or another … it is going to suck at times … many times …

What is that saying ?

"Get comfortable with being uncomfortable." evil grin

Charlie 1210 Feb 2017 7:20 p.m. PST

Get comfortable with being uncomfortable.

LOL!! Isn't that the unofficial motto of the US Army?

Or, as a SGT once told me, "Its not a matter of whether it gonna suck or not, its just the degree of suck involved".

Lion in the Stars10 Feb 2017 7:50 p.m. PST

And whether the suck is equally distributed.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse11 Feb 2017 9:19 a.m. PST

Ah … the good old days … evil grin

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.