Help support TMP


"Samurai with Bows. Basing Advice needed" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Dux Bellorum


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


Featured Movie Review


1,498 hits since 21 Jan 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Lucius21 Jan 2017 10:02 a.m. PST

I'm re-basing a pair of 28mm samurai armies that I did a long time ago. I did settle on 4 foot figures per 50mm x 50mm square base.

When I did the army, I painted 32 samurai with bows, per side, as 2 units of 16. My question – is this even realistic? Did samurai proper(as opposed to ashigaru) ever act as a bow unit, or did they just use whatever weapon they felt like at the time?

From a practical point of view – would you guys mount them as pure bow units(4 per square stand), or would you just mix them in with other samurai with swords/yari?

jwebster Supporting Member of TMP21 Jan 2017 11:05 a.m. PST

I would focus on rules that you are going to use and what they say

I seem to remember that unit structure was pretty flexible. Samurai would be in charge of Ashigaru bow units, but also some Samurai units. In Sengoku period probably no Samurai Archer units, but more likely earlier. Actual units were small and arranged in a number of ways to form bigger units that were mixed – the bigger units is generally what most wargames represent.

I have only looked at skirmish rules, but I doubt many large battle rules are accurate historically (killer katanas is supposed to be very well researched) so I doubt that it is that important what you do

John

Bowman21 Jan 2017 5:52 p.m. PST

I totally agree with jwebster.

Rule sets that have nice linear troop formations that represent a Roman cohort or a Greek phalanx are not really that good at representing the looser formations of ancient barbarians, dark age war bands, or samurai forces.

Jwebster says do what your favourite rule set indicates and don't sweat the accuracy too much. I concur.

By the Senguko period it was ashigaru that made up the formed up archer units. There are descriptions of samurai archers in the Imjin wars, but they were more individualistic combats.

BelgianRay21 Jan 2017 6:00 p.m. PST

Depends wich era you are talking about.

Lucius21 Jan 2017 9:50 p.m. PST

Thanks for the advice. I got Battles in the Age of War, which doesn't have Samurai with bows at all, which certainly fits in with Bowman's comment.

I'll probably keep them as 4 x 4 bowmen, and figure out some early scenarios for them.

Miniaturepainter05 Feb 2017 12:39 p.m. PST

HI Lucius

Just updated my go at rebasing some of my bow-armed ashigaru

link

Cheers

Lion in the Stars06 Feb 2017 2:39 p.m. PST

Based on EValerio's work on the Takeda Screens ( TMP link ), it looks like you'd have a few smaller squads of samurai archers strengthening a couple big squads of Ashigaru archers:

There's one small squad of samurai archers out ahead of the mass of ashigaru archers as skirmishers and sharpshooters.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.