| Gratian | 18 Jan 2017 11:02 p.m. PST |
It's back on apparently. I enjoyed these rules very much – albeit with a bit of frustration with the way the rules were written. Glad to see they're looking at a v2 again with aims for it to be easier to understand, simplified and a faster game. ' link Is anyone in the Nottingham area interested in play testing? |
| steamingdave47 | 19 Jan 2017 4:18 a.m. PST |
Certainly do not intend to shell out yet more hard earned cash on another version of these rules. They ought to offer a one to one swop if they actually sort out the problems with the original book. Played them a few times, the basic mechanisms are good, but the organisation of the rule book is awful, Even the layout of the QRS is sometimes baffling. |
| martinwilliams | 19 Jan 2017 5:17 a.m. PST |
I have to admit that the organisation of the book put me off for quite a while but a friend insisted they were worth the effort and perseverance payed off. They are a great set of rules. Really good for both competition and historical scenarios. I know the people working on the re-write (the main aim of which is to improve clarity and organisation) and have every confidence they will deliver. I hope it will lead to more people playing what is an under-appreciated set of rules. Martin |
| daler240D | 19 Jan 2017 5:34 a.m. PST |
Skeptical. The first ones were a mess. For that kind of money, I should not have to work so hard. |
| Guthroth | 19 Jan 2017 5:53 a.m. PST |
Probably a decent set of rules but an unreadable layout. Like others have said however, I am unlikely to spend more money on them. |
 Flashman14  | 19 Jan 2017 8:22 a.m. PST |
|
| Gratian | 19 Jan 2017 10:33 a.m. PST |
If they could compile a good all in one book (with army lists) for a reasonable cost it should be worth it. How much is Blucher now!? I like Blucher but I find it a little bit too abract / high level. |
 Condotta | 19 Jan 2017 12:11 p.m. PST |
Gratian, thanks for the good news. I enjoy these rules and look forward to a revival created by V2. |
| Tony S | 19 Jan 2017 2:16 p.m. PST |
That's great news! Totally agree with everyone else's assessment of poorly organized. Great set of rules, once we figured everything out. |
| Gratian | 19 Jan 2017 2:37 p.m. PST |
I was a bit surprised after a seeing couple of stalled attempts come and go. I think they have lots of appeal. Glad to see there's some interest. |
| Bandolier | 19 Jan 2017 4:07 p.m. PST |
I'll be getting V2 as well. Great rules once the subtleties became clear. The problems with the layout started when we had to stop a game for 15 minutes to look for an answer on horse artillery… |
| Rudysnelson | 19 Jan 2017 4:19 p.m. PST |
I enjoyed the rules. I also worked on some supplemental army lists that were not released but I really enjoyed working on them. |
paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.
