| Tango01 | 18 Jan 2017 12:47 p.m. PST |
Cool!
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
| Puddinhead Johnson | 18 Jan 2017 12:52 p.m. PST |
Wrong board Tango. Minden, 1759, was an SYW battle. |
| randy51 | 18 Jan 2017 7:42 p.m. PST |
Wrong board? That's OK, Tango. Most of us probably knew Minden was syw anyway. Thanks for posting. |
| Tango01 | 18 Jan 2017 10:19 p.m. PST |
I do not understand what happened today… weird cases on posting… recently I choose Fantasy and the thread goes to Pirates… another one on Fantasy… disappeared and then appeared… Halloween Day?… (smile) I remember to choose 18th Century here also… Even that… glad you like it my friend!.
Amicalement
Armand
|
| Marc at work | 19 Jan 2017 2:24 a.m. PST |
Nice battle anyway At first I thought it was a "what if" Napoleonic. But hey ho, these things happen |
| Marc at work | 19 Jan 2017 2:25 a.m. PST |
Are some of those Peter Laing figures – something about the poses reminds me of them |
| Sharpe52 | 19 Jan 2017 6:40 a.m. PST |
Yes indeed. They are Peter Laing figures. I have still plenty of them. Rather plain figures but full of character. I love them so much!!
Marco |
 deadhead  | 19 Jan 2017 7:42 a.m. PST |
That really did make a nice change! What a colourful era that could be. I love the massed cavalry and the dice bases, with individual units, I have never seen before. Clever! |
| Tango01 | 19 Jan 2017 11:42 a.m. PST |
Happy you enjoyed it my friends!. (smile)
Amicalement
Armand
|
| Marc at work | 20 Jan 2017 7:27 a.m. PST |
And that is why some of us still like Peter Laing – if they could be released cheaply enough they make great wargames figures (Liam – not for you, move on  ). I know they are basic, but en masse they work really well. |
| jambo1 | 21 Jan 2017 3:12 a.m. PST |
Wrong board yes but great to see!! Lovely figures, I like the simpleness of them, really liked looking at them. |
