Help support TMP


"8th century Anglo-Saxons" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Dark Ages Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Dux Bellorum


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Fighting 15's Teutonic Order Command 1410

Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.


Featured Workbench Article

Homemade Palm Trees

Dervel Fezian returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,325 hits since 11 Jan 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Druzhina11 Jan 2017 10:43 p.m. PST
GurKhan12 Jan 2017 3:02 a.m. PST

"The riders in helmets are now thought to be Northumbrian Anglo-Saxons in Coppergate style helmets."

Thought by some. Angus Konstam in the Osprey "Pictich Warrior" reckoned the stone does not commemorate the battle of Nechtansmere against the Northumbrians, but an earlier fight against the Strathclyde British – who would be the helmeted riders.

4D Jones12 Jan 2017 6:18 a.m. PST

What are Konstam's sources for this "earlier fight against Strathclyde British"?

The helmeted riders could well be Northumbrian Anglo-Saxons if we remember that the northern part of Northumbria was originally Saxon Bernicia. In that region a Saxon elite seems to have taken over from the earlier British elite in the British tribal area known as Gododdin.

And we know from the eponymous poem that the Gododdin were great horsemen; and that Nechtansmere was only a generation or so from roughly the time of the takeover (c.600). The Northumbrians could have well inherited this tradition of mounted combat, if not actually having Gododdin in their army.

Of course, the Strathclyde British could also have fought mounted, in helmets, at this and other times.

GurKhan12 Jan 2017 6:47 a.m. PST

I don't recall offhand what detailed arguments he gives: probably those summarised at link

Though I was mistaken – it's a _later_ battle, in 744, not an earlier one.

Hobhood412 Jan 2017 11:14 a.m. PST

Simple. Konstam states that the Saxons did not fight mounted, so the mounted figures can't be Saxons. There is also an argument that the aesthetics of the carving indicate a later period than Nechtnasmere.

Ney Ney12 Jan 2017 11:35 a.m. PST

Is Konstam an expert in this period? I'd never thought of him as one. Not that I know anything!

Oh Bugger12 Jan 2017 12:01 p.m. PST

The Picts frequently fought with the North British and both of them had a long established cavalry tradition. They were also looking at each other over a deep political divide.

Bernicia in its earliest days could well have had access to British cavalry. As time went on and the Angles became more consolidated as the dominant class I'd say that changed.

Despite some heroic efforts in recent times there is no evidence for a cavalry tradition among the peoples who became the English.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.