"Giant DBA: Issus, an After Action Report " Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board
Action Log
03 Jan 2017 8:24 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from Ancients Scenarios board
- Crossposted to Ancients Battle Reports board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Beowulf  paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.
Featured Book Review
|
| Attalus I | 03 Jan 2017 8:22 p.m. PST |
An after action report on our attempt to re-fight Issus using Giant DBA on my blog: link |
YogiBearMinis  | 04 Jan 2017 5:37 a.m. PST |
I like some of your optional rules--DBA 3.0 is our favorite edition by far, and we no longer play DBM, but I miss some of the differentiation available under the DBM rules. |
| Durban Gamer | 04 Jan 2017 6:17 a.m. PST |
Final version of optional rules sounds great for historical refights. |
| vtsaogames | 04 Jan 2017 7:55 a.m. PST |
|
| KTravlos | 04 Jan 2017 12:28 p.m. PST |
|
| Attalus I | 04 Jan 2017 1:40 p.m. PST |
I like some of your optional rules--DBA 3.0 is our favorite edition by far, and we no longer play DBM, but I miss some of the differentiation available under the DBM rules. Thanks. Yes, I miss some (not all) of the differentiation of DBM. DBA is too generic for an army like the Macedonians or a scenario like this. At the same time, I want to keep the simplicity of DBA as much as possible. The trick is adding the right amount of simple, period specific flavor, if needed. |
|
