Help support TMP


"What Color for AWI Crossbelts ?" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 18th Century Painting Guides Message Board

Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


1,634 hits since 27 Dec 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pan Marek27 Dec 2016 4:11 p.m. PST

I think many of us grew up thinking that both sides had white leather cross belts. Now, this appears to be true, to some extent. Troiani, however, paints many (most?) of his figures with black cross belts. For both Continental and British armies.
What was the extent of use for black leather belts? Since
I've not encountered any explanations from Troiani, can anyone give me an idea as to the frequency of black belting versus white in the AWI?

Winston Smith27 Dec 2016 4:45 p.m. PST

For the British army, almost every regiment had white cross belts.
Regiments with buff facings had buff cross belts.
Light infantry companies and Highland regiments had black.

Continentals had whatever was supplied to them.

historygamer27 Dec 2016 4:50 p.m. PST

Like all questions on the period, there is no simple answer.

For Brits, the general rule is that most belts (cartridge pouch and bayonet belt) were whitened leather for hat companies and grenadiers. Light infantry generally wore black leather. Highlanders generally wore black leather. Regiments with buff wore buff colored leather (along with their small clothes) though there are exceptions to this, perhaps done more from expediency (shortage of supplies) than form.

American kit is must more complicated. Much of their gear might be cloth straps as opposed to leather. But if it was leather it would likely be white.

The other "straps" you often see on figures represent the haversack (light grey/brown linen) and the canteen strap, which could range from hemp rope to cloth.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP27 Dec 2016 6:46 p.m. PST

Perhaps worth noting that it's not unheard of for pipeclay to be neglected in the field, and even black leather requires some maintenance. (I'm redying boots this evening.) As a wargamer, I like my troops inspection-ready, but I suspect if you could get photographs of the AWI, you'd get a certain number of "are those white or buff?" and even a few "you're sure those aren't natural leather?" belts.

Major Bloodnok28 Dec 2016 6:05 a.m. PST

Not all British Light Infantry wore black belts. Officially they were to be black "tan" leather, however some regiments went and whitened their black belts making them look "exceedingly ill". Rebel belts can be white buff, black, or linen webbing. I know of a couple of cartridge boxes that had russet leather(natural, uncoloured) pouches with white buff straps.

Pan Marek28 Dec 2016 8:38 a.m. PST

Thanks all!

Virginia Tory28 Dec 2016 11:46 a.m. PST

And in some cases entire units had black leather, such as the 24th during the Saratoga campaign.

historygamer28 Dec 2016 11:09 p.m. PST

Like I said, there is no simple answer, only a generalized one, or you have to get into specific units (which might vary from year to year).

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.