Help support TMP


"What Replaced WAB?" Topic


43 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Action Log

27 May 2017 3:37 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Phalangites

More figures for the 28mm Amazon army!


Featured Workbench Article

The Army for Bill: The Ancient Britons

The Army for Bill was a collective project in which TMP'ers came together to jointly paint an Ancients army for yours truly.


2,701 hits since 29 Nov 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian29 Nov 2016 7:33 a.m. PST

As a former Warhammer Ancient Battles player, what ruleset have you replaced it with?

* I still play WAB
* I play (?) instead
* I don't play Ancients any more

IUsedToBeSomeone29 Nov 2016 7:36 a.m. PST

Erm… option one rules out being a former WAB player… :-)

I still play WAB

Mike

Winston Smith29 Nov 2016 7:46 a.m. PST

You're not allowed!
It's no longer supported!!!!

JimDuncanUK29 Nov 2016 7:54 a.m. PST

Hail Caesar

37049scott29 Nov 2016 8:08 a.m. PST

War and Conquest

Hafen von Schlockenberg29 Nov 2016 8:35 a.m. PST

D. Never played it

GamesPoet Supporting Member of TMP29 Nov 2016 8:51 a.m. PST

Impetus

TMPWargamerabbit29 Nov 2016 9:05 a.m. PST

Clash of Empires (COE) by Great Escape Games. A cousin of WAB.

D6 Junkie29 Nov 2016 9:13 a.m. PST

Clash of Empires

GarrisonMiniatures29 Nov 2016 9:21 a.m. PST

Wot's WAB?

DBX/HoTT – none of that modern stuff.

wargame insomniac29 Nov 2016 9:28 a.m. PST

+1 for Hail Caesar.

If it was good enough for the likes of Rick Priestley and the Perry twins, then certainly good enough for me!!

pogoame29 Nov 2016 9:40 a.m. PST

Swordpoint looks to be tempting the oldhand Wabbers

mgdavey29 Nov 2016 9:47 a.m. PST

I still play WAB

Mike Target29 Nov 2016 9:58 a.m. PST

Hail Caeser!

Bernhard Rauch29 Nov 2016 10:19 a.m. PST

I still play WAB, great game.

raylev329 Nov 2016 10:42 a.m. PST

War and Conquest

Garand29 Nov 2016 10:43 a.m. PST

I picked up CoE as my replacement. Too bad no one plays it around here…

Damon.

Personal logo Schulein Supporting Member of TMP29 Nov 2016 10:46 a.m. PST

War & Conquest
Hail Caesar

Mars Ultor29 Nov 2016 11:11 a.m. PST

CoE is my replacement. D6 Junkie and I have had very satisfying games with Successors v Romans. I like that the Roman pilum is no longer the weapon of mass destruction it used to be in WAB (and actually I am the Roman player).

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP29 Nov 2016 11:21 a.m. PST

Still play WAB but now also play Hail Caesar

DColtman29 Nov 2016 11:37 a.m. PST

We've played a few but no clear successor – there is some optimism that KoW Historical might catch on.

JJartist29 Nov 2016 11:50 a.m. PST

WAB 1.5 still is the best version (of WAB) for in period games, especially Dark Ages, IMO.

I've tried CoE, War and Conquest and find the changes did not help my enjoyment all that much, the added complexity of CoE made it drop out of sight locally very quickly, which made it doubly difficult to evaluate.

People made a gallant effort to keep WAB 2 afloat, but I think the massive volumes, expensive and also heavy made that more of an issue. The GW insistence on hard bound giant tomes full of too much visual padding eventually bloated itself out, like a Mongol Nurglian Warlord.
I never enjoyed hefting around WAB2, but WAB 1.5 with one paperback supplement was ok. The other thing is army books… the internet has made this redundant. Rules writers should give out army lists, and keep it basic like the original WAB AoA. (which is still my favorite format-- two pages per army, enough variety. But sadly to many loopholes that were never corrected-- if the loopholes and bad army choices were simply addressed quickly then folks may still be playing WAB 1.5 with a living army list document online)… but I digress…

WAB's current disfavor is that it is a single model style game- in a world where elements are all the rage.

WAB's greatest advantage was when it was 'hooked up' with WFB and a ready crowd of fantasy gamers could see a historical game in progress and realize they could switch over easily with just the investment in models.
Now that is dead, the connection is lost, so WAB style games are part of the past. However just because they are not supported anymore that does not diminish the merits, and of course players are even more encouraged to tinker with the rules to make them their own. That is all I ever did.

lugal hdan29 Nov 2016 12:28 p.m. PST

Is WAB 1.5 the original rulebook with the update rules (like FBIGO) from the various supplements, or was there another publication I missed?

Personal logo BigRedBat Sponsoring Member of TMP29 Nov 2016 12:39 p.m. PST

The thing I loved about WAB were the beautifully painted 28mm armies, the high production values and the imagination applied to the army lists. These got me back into ancients; I never really got to play WAB but bought all the books, anyhow.

Ney Ney29 Nov 2016 1:57 p.m. PST

It fragmented like Alexanders empire!!

NickNorthStar29 Nov 2016 2:08 p.m. PST

I agree. It hasn't been replaced really. Locally we had a lot of WAB players. Most play other periods instead now. Each of above mentioned games have been played a bit, but not regularly like WAB, and even then it's been with WAB armies rather than collecting new ones.

Dare I say Saga took a big chunk of Ancient/ Medieval enthusiasm, with a bit of Lion Rampant in there as well, at least as far as new army collecting went.

Swordpoint is enjoyable. It's not 'WAB', it's a different type of game, I hope it'll take off locally.

Grunt186129 Nov 2016 2:38 p.m. PST

Commands and Colors Ancients with miniatures.

Teklea201829 Nov 2016 2:51 p.m. PST

WAB 1.5

Played war and conquest for a good while, but it ended up just being a rounded off version of WAB, which isn't as much fun, so back I went and there I'll stay!

lugal hdan – 1.5 was a re-print of the original rules, but with errata, clarifications and new army lists added to the back of the book for good measure. Best edition by a clear mile.

I hope Swordpoint does well for all parties, but fear it might be another attempt to recreate the good old days of WAB, which instead might just fragment players even further.

dsfrank29 Nov 2016 3:28 p.m. PST

Kings of War Historical rules

TKindred Supporting Member of TMP29 Nov 2016 3:28 p.m. PST

Another WAB 1.5 player here. It's still my favorite ancients period game system, though I also play Basic Impetus and Impetus.

WAB being out of production certainly doesn't deserve the criticism it gets. That belongs to GW who wrote it off. However, it still has a large following and the rules are almost always available through ebay and other 2nd hand sources, though the follow-on era-specific modules might be a tad pricey.

I would hope that someone might be able to pry the rights to WAB free from GW and put it back into publication, or even convince GW to republish it. The rules really are that good, and the publication values were top of the line too. A good, solid,set of rules and a great deal of supporting data included in one book. Can't beat that for value.

Ivan DBA29 Nov 2016 5:03 p.m. PST

Hail Caesar.

Tarty2Ts29 Nov 2016 5:54 p.m. PST

I always thought WAB was nicely put together shame to see it get treated the way it did…didn't deserve that I agree.
Very much an Impetus player these days but any set that gets ancients on the table is fine by me.

David O Brien29 Nov 2016 5:54 p.m. PST

I really enjoyed WAB but the guys I game with switched over to Hail Caesar which I don't enjoy as much and I also fell out of favour with the game because of the Byzantine book where the armies listed just seemed to over power armies from any other books.

Tgunner29 Nov 2016 6:40 p.m. PST

I tried it, but I just couldn't get into it. Then LOTR came onto the scene and I moved to that. I haven't really looked back since.

Besides, my Arthurian troops fit in just nicely!

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP29 Nov 2016 6:46 p.m. PST

I gave up on Ancients after WRG 7th went astray.

Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut29 Nov 2016 6:59 p.m. PST

DBA 3

Lion Rampant (thank you, Bashytubits!)

SAGA (up and coming after I move)

Syrinx029 Nov 2016 7:25 p.m. PST

We still play some WAB. I like Hail Caesar as well. Picked up War and Conquest but have not gotten a chance to play it.

Timotheous29 Nov 2016 9:05 p.m. PST

Warmaster ancients, followed soon after by FoG, and now sticking with DBA 3.0

WAB was a lot of fun, but I only got around to painting one army (Hitties), and then not nearly enough chariots.

With DBA, I can knock out a new army in a few weeks, rather than months or years!

langobard30 Nov 2016 3:05 a.m. PST

Hail Caesar.

10mm Wargaming30 Nov 2016 5:03 a.m. PST

Hail Caesar

Wackmole930 Nov 2016 7:04 a.m. PST

Hail Caesar

BelgianRay30 Nov 2016 12:57 p.m. PST

JJartist says : "WAB's current disfavor is that it is a single model style game- in a world where elements are all the rage."
I agree and will never have anything to do with element based rules (too much boardgame approach). But then isn't it funny if you look at the succes of SAGA and Lion Rampant for smaller actions ?

Scorpio30 Nov 2016 1:15 p.m. PST

Please include a selection for 'not an Ancients gamer'

(Leftee)02 Dec 2016 7:02 a.m. PST

Impetus and Commands and Colors. Much to still like about WAB though.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.