"British Motor Companies (44/45)" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article72 riflemen join our forces!
Featured Workbench ArticleDoes anyone else have trouble with the color green on microscale vehicles?
|
ciaphas | 25 Nov 2016 4:38 a.m. PST |
Hi, couple of quick and fairly basic questions.. At company level the British deploy a pair of 3" mortars are these the left overs of the the 3" mortar platoon or an add on? PIAT's is there only one at platoon HQ or like early war Boys (American bazookas) held in the M3/1500cwt ? If only held at platoon level how were the British to deal with armour? thanks jon |
Starfury Rider | 25 Nov 2016 4:49 a.m. PST |
The Motor Bn never had a 3-in Mortar Pl in any of its various incarnations. A single 3-in mortar was originally added to each Motor Coy via an amendment in late 1941 and incorporated into the North African/Middle East organisation. This was increased to a pair of weapons with the model used in NWE. The Motor Coy had eight PIATs (one per Motor Pl, three in the Scout Pl, one with the Mortar det and one with the Admin vehicles). The Motor Bn also had twelve towed 6-pr atk guns, so a Motor Coy could usually expect a Pl of four guns to be attached to it for more substantial atk defence. Gary |
Griefbringer | 25 Nov 2016 7:34 a.m. PST |
What Gary said above. The early motor battalions seem to have been pretty lightly equipped with support weapons, perhaps the idea was that the tanks that they were cooperating with would provide enough firepower. The late war motor battalion support company on the other hand was pretty impressive, packing not only the previously mentioned 12 anti-tank guns but also 8 Vickers MGs (of which ordinary infantry battalion had none as integral assets, instead relying on platoons attached from the divisional MG battalion). |
Starfury Rider | 26 Nov 2016 3:50 a.m. PST |
Yes, I've always assumed the absence of mortars and towed atk guns in the early war period was based on the presumption that the accompanying cruiser tanks would provide support with their 2-pr guns and CS howitzers. Or I might have read it somewhere too! Gary |
|