"Roman Empire Military Organization (802 - 867 AD)" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Profile ArticleFor the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
Tango01 | 17 Nov 2016 12:55 p.m. PST |
"Eastern Roman military history had suffered from a near total lack of proper histories written by those who witnessed the events. We historians have to fill in the lack of detailed information with what we know from similar events. The Byzantine military has not been given proper credit by historians. We have literally mountains of information in excruciating detail on the American Civil War and World War II. But when it comes to the Eastern Empire documents on military units, fortifications, budgets and battles have vanished into the mists of time. It is safe to say the the Eastern Roman military machine was not a haphazard or accidental creation. The Byzantines carried on the Roman tradition of a highly organized military. This can be seen in the structure and variety of full time professional units that were backed up by a large body of trained reserves. We see it also in command structure, military provinces (themes) and huge numbers of fortifications. To run such an extensive military war machine required not only a well trained officer corps but also a large bureaucracy to direct supplies, recruits, hospitals and more…" Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Sobieski | 18 Nov 2016 9:59 p.m. PST |
|
|