"Dimensions of a French An XI 6-pounder?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Old School Wargaming Message Board Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral Napoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset Rating:
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleScratch-builders often need basic wood shapes. Here is what is available inexpensively at the dollar store.
Featured Profile Article
|
4th Cuirassier | 03 Nov 2016 4:01 a.m. PST |
My Google Fu has let me down and I have been unable to find the above. Does anyone have a sketch or similar of a French 6-pounder that shows these key dimensions? I ask because I have lately acquired a few Airfix Waterloo box sets (£25 off Amazon – you can't complain, really). There are various issues with these, notably that the French infantry are all NCOs, but one of the more soluble ones is the artillery. I figure if I put the gun wheels on the limbers and the British gun wheels on the guns I'll have something closer to the right shape. What I don't have a reliable idea of what then needs to be done to the trail. I know the obvious answer is to buy something better but old school is as old school does… |
Brechtel198 | 03 Nov 2016 5:22 a.m. PST |
Rene Chartrand's Osprey on Napoleon's Guns, Volume I, should help you. You can also put the AN XI 6-pounder gun tube on a Gribeauval 8-pounder gun carriage, though the 6-pounder did not have travelling trunnion plates as there was no need for them with the lighter gun tube. Another idea may be to get the three volumes on the Gribeauval System by Mongin and Letrun: link link link All three are well-illustrated and the Systeme AN XI is included. |
Marc at work | 03 Nov 2016 6:40 a.m. PST |
While I appreciate the OSW approach, I must admit I personally wouldn't bother. There are really just so many better alternatives – I kept the crew (I quite like them actually) and added the spare Italeri guns from the guard horse artillery (two guns per box, one crew firing, one evidently limbered) And the limbers are beyond saving in my (not so) humble opinion. Buy a box of HaT limbers and treasure the rest of the box's contents (and that way you get to keep the RHA guns and wheels for the Brits – still an excellent set) Marc |
4th Cuirassier | 03 Nov 2016 3:45 p.m. PST |
Oh, I've got accurate Napoleonic minis – in 28mm metal. I want some inaccurate ones as well, in 1/72 plastic…for old times' sake. :-) Following Kevin's suggestion I've Googled a Gribeauval 8-pounder carriage, which the Airfix effort resembles no less than it does an An XI piece, or a cane chair, or a table lamp, it must be said. It looks like the overall carriage length is about twice the wheel diameter. Is it right that the track of the limber should be narrower than that of the gun? |
Brechtel198 | 03 Nov 2016 3:48 p.m. PST |
That is an excellent question. I haven't even thought about that one before. However, having checked it now, the wheel bases were the same for the piece and its limber. |
4th Cuirassier | 04 Nov 2016 4:25 a.m. PST |
Thanks Kevin, good enough for me. I hadn't thought about it either until I came across this: link The plan view looks as though the track of the limber might perhaps be marginally narrower. But I have no idea of the actual source, and in any case, on closer inspection I think it is an optical illusion – the limber wheel is drawn thinner than the gun wheel and with a smaller outside boss / hub arrangement. So the limber's overall width is visibly less but the track of the actual wheels is as you say the same. |
Rudysnelson | 04 Nov 2016 9:20 p.m. PST |
The Almark book, a 1970s book, on French Napoleonic artillery has some good notes in it. |
|