"China Experimenting With Catapult Launched Carrier Aircraft" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleMal Wright experiments to find a better way to mount aircraft for wargaming.
Featured Profile ArticlesargonII, traveling in the Middle East, continues his report on the gates of Jerusalem.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Editor in Chief Bill | 23 Sep 2016 7:32 p.m. PST |
China has stepped up development of Catapult-Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery (CATOBAR) operations for its carriers, with the appearance of a Shenyang J-15 Flying Shark carrier-borne fighter with CATOBAR apparatus and continued construction of supporting land-based infrastructure… link |
zoneofcontrol | 23 Sep 2016 8:14 p.m. PST |
Catapult Launched Aircraft Carrier?!? Sure it leaves port in a hurry but how do you "launch" it back to port for repairs and resupply? LOL! |
Toronto48 | 23 Sep 2016 9:46 p.m. PST |
One thing about the Chinese Military is the obsession of getting something right no matter how long it takes Budgets accidents and casualties are not factors |
Mako11 | 23 Sep 2016 10:30 p.m. PST |
They do seem to have lots of money to burn, and are learning quickly from others. Interesting that they appear to have rather quickly abandoned the ski-jump style of carrier deck. Appears to me they are playing the long game, and have major plans. Rumor has it they might even covet an Atlantic Ocean airbase, if the US makes good on abandoning that. I think it is in the Azores, and is frequently used for basing strategic bombers, aerial refueling, and can also serve as an anti-sub aircraft base too. |
David Manley | 24 Sep 2016 2:14 a.m. PST |
They do have a decent budget but they don't have the massive overheads and contractor induced sky high prices that many western nations endure. The move to CATOBAR is no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention to what the PLAN has been openly discussing for the last decade or so :) |
|