"FIW 25mm figure size comparison" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the French and Indian Wars Message Board
Areas of Interest18th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
| Sundance | 22 Sep 2016 5:54 p.m. PST |
So follow up to my previous questions: Do the Conquest minis use slottabases? And how do the Galloping Major, Conquest and other manufacturers compare size-wise? Are they pretty close or is there a wide gap in height and bulk? Thanks! |
| rustymusket | 22 Sep 2016 6:20 p.m. PST |
Conquest does not use slottabases. I don't how the sizes compare. |
| Sundance | 22 Sep 2016 6:57 p.m. PST |
Well that trumps the size comparison – I hate slottabases! Thanks! |
| nevinsrip | 22 Sep 2016 7:42 p.m. PST |
Conquest are close to 25 mm while GM is close to 30 mm and a much heftier figures. Conquest look like children next to GM. It all depends on you own preference.
Personally, I like both. |
| InquisitorMoloko | 23 Sep 2016 7:31 a.m. PST |
This is what you're looking for I think: link |
| 22ndFoot | 23 Sep 2016 8:45 a.m. PST |
Most of the Conquest figures are very nice but a couple of their British regulars are in rather bizarre poses. The sergeant waiving his sword while carrying his spontoon and the hatman clearly "tick-tocking" are examples. Their French regulars are much better. |
| Militia Pete | 25 Sep 2016 5:25 a.m. PST |
I mix my Conquest with Perry and Old Glory. |
|
