Help support TMP


"Rare photo of the Iron Brigade of the AoP" Topic


20 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Media Message Board

Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Brother Against Brother


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery Limber

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes his initial Union force in 1:72nd scale.


Featured Workbench Article

Basing With Stucco Crack Repair

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian tries a stucco repair product to contour his bases.


Featured Book Review


1,648 hits since 18 Sep 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Cuirassier18 Sep 2016 2:23 p.m. PST

This fantastic photo of Company K of the 19th Indiana Infantry Regiment, part of the famous and feared Iron Brigade, was supposedely taken two or three weeks after the Battle of Antietam (or even just a few days after the battle). After the battles of 2nd Bull Run, South Mountain and Antietam, this was what was left of Company K.

CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO ENLARGE THEM.

link

link

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP18 Sep 2016 2:44 p.m. PST

It is not an unknown image. I am afraid I don't understand the excitement. It is a good photograph of early war leggings being worn in the field.

rmaker18 Sep 2016 2:46 p.m. PST

OK, 12 men out of 80-100 at muster in. Yes, but how big was the company before those battles? And how many missing men wandered back in during the next few days? And how many were in hospital with smallpox, dysentery, measles, mumps, VD, etc.?

Cuirassier18 Sep 2016 2:55 p.m. PST

Sorry, 79th. I thought it was a rare image. I can only hope other members will be excited to see this photo.

Extrabio1947 Supporting Member of TMP18 Sep 2016 3:27 p.m. PST

I don't know when this picture was made, but it almost looks very early war. The sergeant standing on the far right is wearing a NCO sword, which is useless as a weapon and only adds to the weight carried. The fellow standing holding a bottle is wearing his cartridge box on the left hip rather than the right, and seems to be carrying a white cotton or canvas haversack. The knapsacks are well packed and the blankets (or greatcoats per regulation) tightly rolled. The humor displayed in the photograph – with one soldier holding up hardtack for the camera, seems to center on the novelties of soldier life rather than the look of 12 survivors of a badly shot up company.

Garde de Paris18 Sep 2016 3:31 p.m. PST

But it's a great photo, and I've never seen it before. How lean they look, unlike the Hobbit figures we use in today's wargames!

GdeP

Dan Beattie18 Sep 2016 5:50 p.m. PST

Not necessarily early War. Many soldiers wore leggings at Gettysburg; they had been issued recently by the army. The famous "black hats" were worn at Gettysburg and later.

A wonderful photo which I never saw before. Outdoor scenes are rare.

I looked through my books, the Library of Congress collection and the National Archives collection. It is not in any of them.

You might try Lance Herdegen's 2012 book, "The Iron Brigade in Civil War and Memory."

DJCoaltrain18 Sep 2016 6:30 p.m. PST

Deviations from regulation requirements are quite common among military personnel. Three months into the first of my two tours in Southeast Asia, began wearing a Marine campaign cap instead of the regulation "baseball" cap, or the "Aussie" hat. It was far more convenient and practical. I was never taken to task for my non-reg apparel. There was also a wide choice of acceptable footwear, which allowed me to wear Wellington Boots for most of the time. So this photo is very interesting

I like the photo. Of course I like all ACW photographs.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP18 Sep 2016 7:55 p.m. PST

@Cuirassier: Sorry if I came off as rude; that was not my intention.

AussieAndy18 Sep 2016 8:23 p.m. PST

They will need to put on a few pounds if they want to become re-enactors.

DJCoaltrain19 Sep 2016 12:07 a.m. PST

LOL AussieAndy.

Cleburne186319 Sep 2016 2:43 a.m. PST

I think there is a picture of the 118th Pennsylvania just before Gettysburg in newly issued leggings.

mwindsorfw19 Sep 2016 7:05 a.m. PST

I was struck by the lack of beards. In old movies, no one had a beard, and in newer movies, it seems that everyone does. Here is looks like 6 clean-shaven, 4 with beards, and a couple I can't tell. Obviously, this was in camp, but it was interesting to me.

jowady19 Sep 2016 7:15 a.m. PST

Deviations from regulation requirements are quite common among military personnel. Three months into the first of my two tours in Southeast Asia, began wearing a Marine campaign cap instead of the regulation "baseball" cap, or the "Aussie" hat. It was far more convenient and practical. I was never taken to task for my non-reg apparel

My Dad used to get a big kick out of folks talking about proper place for equipment and proper uniforms in combat. He fought in NW Europe in WW2 and he said that the last time that they were fully regulation was when they dropped their gas masks crossing the beach (they weren't part of the assault).

donlowry19 Sep 2016 8:44 a.m. PST

They don't seem to be wearing frock coats.

ACWBill19 Sep 2016 4:38 p.m. PST

I see a few frock coats there. Thanks for posting the images. I have literally hundreds of ACW photos, perhaps thousands, and I cannot recall seeing them.

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP20 Sep 2016 3:38 a.m. PST

It's hard to be sure, but it looks like the Hardee hats have the regulation black feathers on the left side. That might argue for early war. Most photos I've seen of Iron Brigade troops don't have the feathers.

Cuirassier20 Sep 2016 6:26 a.m. PST

Don't worry, 79th. ;-)

Glad you guys liked the photo.

COL Scott ret21 Sep 2016 3:37 a.m. PST

very nice.

1968billsfan23 Sep 2016 11:00 a.m. PST

If you look closely the feathers are wing feathers and not the regulation saddle hackle feathers

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.