Help support TMP


"Basing Generals in the AWI." Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Basing Message Board

Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Current Poll


1,193 hits since 12 Sep 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Old Contemptibles12 Sep 2016 9:38 p.m. PST

In most of the periods I do, the brigade commanders are based individually. One mounted figure on one base. Then division commanders have two to a base and three for a corps commander.

Does anyone do this for the American Revolution? For example, the Trenton OB shows Greene's Division. General Greene has three brigades. Do you represent Greene with a two figure base?

I maybe wrong about this but I don't think corps level organization existed until the Napoleonic Wars. So should Washington have three figures on a base?

So do most players do one figure per base on all command levels? I know I can do what I like but I am just curious how others have approached this.

Old Contemptibles12 Sep 2016 9:46 p.m. PST

Here is an example of one possibility.

link

Ironwolf12 Sep 2016 10:41 p.m. PST

Here is how we do it for the AWI rules. Very similar to what you are explaining above.

YouTube link

Winston Smith12 Sep 2016 10:44 p.m. PST

If I thought to use "staff", I would.
Instead, I use fender washers, where the diameter determines level of command.
No. Not really. grin
It just worked out that way. I just wanted them based.

Ironwolf12 Sep 2016 11:01 p.m. PST

hahah, I played a game once where the mounted commanders were on different size bases. I asked the GM if that meant anything specific in the rules. He said, No, just had a jar full of different size washers and decided to use them up as bases. hahahaha

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP12 Sep 2016 11:29 p.m. PST

Thats what I do. But I only use the officers required by the rules.

historygamer13 Sep 2016 5:17 a.m. PST

That's what I do as well.

There were no Corps at this time – there was regiments/battalions, brigades, divisions and army columns/wings (as in left or right)

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP13 Sep 2016 6:39 a.m. PST

I follow the same basic principle--lowest level of commander outside units represented by a single figure, and each higher level has more figures on the stand. Obviously the level of commander represented will vary with the rules, but it's a good quick way to keep track of levels, and a visual aid which makes the battlefield look better instead of the usual clutter of markers is too good a system to pass up. (Plus it gives me an excuse to use all those fancy Napoleonic ADC and Guide uniforms.)

Personal logo Flashman14 Supporting Member of TMP13 Sep 2016 7:12 a.m. PST

Yup and round bases too.

bruntonboy13 Sep 2016 7:35 a.m. PST

I use whatever size or shape base as I fancy or fits the figures I am using. Usually that is one or two figures for a brigadier and more for higher ranked bases. It varies.

historygamer13 Sep 2016 9:22 a.m. PST

Brigadier was a somewhat odd rank in that, at least in the British Army it was not a commissioned rank so much as a field command. Brigaiders were often colonels or a lower rank commanding multiple battalions. Doubtful they would have even worn a general's uniform either.

skinkmasterreturns13 Sep 2016 9:50 a.m. PST

Thats how I do it for Black Powder. The army commander is on a huge base with at least two other staff,if not more.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.