"Dwight D. Eisenhower: Life Before the Presidency" Topic
11 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleExperimenting with an idea for storing 15mm figures and vehicles...
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 22 Aug 2016 3:01 p.m. PST |
"Born on October 14, 1890, in a house by the railroad tracks in Denison, Texas, Dwight David Eisenhower spent his youth in the small farm town of Abilene, Kansas. His father, David, worked as a mechanic in a local creamery. His mother, Ida, a Mennonite, was a religious pacifist who opposed war. Eisenhower did family chores, delighted in hunting and fishing and football, and eagerly read military history. In 1911, he won an appointment to West Point, where he played football until he suffered a serious knee injury. His pranks, fondness for cards and smoking, and average grades earned him little respect from his teachers. They thought that he would be a good officer, but not a great one. Rising in the Ranks After graduating in the middle of his class—61st out of 164—Eisenhower spent the next few years at one disappointing station after another, beginning with a stint as a second lieutenant at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas. It was there that he met and married Mamie Doud. At Camp Meade, Maryland, Eisenhower became friends with George S. Patton, Jr. Both Eisenhower and Patton published articles in 1920 advocating that the Army make better use of tanks to prevent a repetition of the static and destructive trench warfare of World War I. But Army authorities considered Eisenhower insubordinate rather than visionary and threatened him with a court-martial if he again challenged official views on infantry warfare. Eisenhower was doubly fortunate when he was transferred to a new assignment in the Panama Canal Zone and got to work as executive officer for General Fox Conner, who appreciated Eisenhower's critical thinking about infantry warfare. Conner became Eisenhower's patron and arranged for a prized appointment that helped propel Eisenhower's career, as a student at the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Eisenhower graduated first in his class of 245 officers, and he was quickly given important assignments. He served as an aide first to General John J. Pershing, commander of U.S. forces in World War I, and then to General Douglas MacArthur, the Army's chief of staff…" More here link In your opinion… Eisenhower was THAT good?…or only a lucky man? Amicalement Armand |
gamershs | 22 Aug 2016 3:21 p.m. PST |
He was in the right place at the right time but that is part skill and part luck. At a time when technology was changing he was able to understand the impact of the technology and adapt to it. That is more then I can say for many of the WWI generals who didn't see the impact of technology and killed millions of soldiers while they learned on the job. |
Jabsen Krause | 22 Aug 2016 3:25 p.m. PST |
A recipe of; intelligence, bloody-mindedness, fearlessness, a pinch of being in the right place at the right time and a dash of knowing the right people …. |
christot | 22 Aug 2016 11:50 p.m. PST |
He never held a field command. He was never really tested as a general in the conventional sense. He was a highly skilled administrator and was adept at holding a highly disparate team together at a critical time, no small thing. |
Fred Cartwright | 23 Aug 2016 2:07 a.m. PST |
They thought that he would be a good officer, but not a great one. They got that bit right! Poor general, average diplomat, poor president. Yes he kept the allied coalition together, just, and that with the help particularly of Alanbrooke to keep Monty in line. Fortunately by the time the cracks started to show at the end of '44 the Germans were practically beaten and it held together long enough to deliver victory. |
ScottWashburn | 23 Aug 2016 6:42 a.m. PST |
I have always maintained that Ike's decision to 'go' on June 6th would place him among the great generals of history no matter what else he may have done in his career. You'd have to look long and hard to find a more courageous decision. |
donlowry | 23 Aug 2016 8:26 a.m. PST |
He was a great choice for the job of SCAEF. I doubt if anyone could have done it better. I also think he was a good, maybe great, president. I doubt, however, that he would have been anything special as a division or corps commander. |
Tango01 | 23 Aug 2016 10:57 a.m. PST |
What happened with him at the Bulge?… it was only responsability of Bradley…? Amicalement Armand |
Marc33594 | 23 Aug 2016 11:18 a.m. PST |
Over time historians, as they are able to study his policies and their results, have steadily ranked Eisenhower as one of our better Presidents with many putting him in the top 10. link |
cosmicbank | 23 Aug 2016 6:51 p.m. PST |
He was on the winning side so by definition a winner. Better at being President than most of them. Also a heck of Golfer |
Weasel | 24 Aug 2016 5:12 p.m. PST |
Even IF he did nothing else but keep the coalition together and functioning as well as it did, he'd get a thumbs up from me. |
|