"Warfare in the Age of Reason, 3rd Edition" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the 18th Century Product Reviews Message Board
Areas of Interest18th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Workbench Article Not just improving a photo, but transforming it using artificial intelligence.
Featured Profile Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Todkershnersgames | 17 Aug 2016 10:44 a.m. PST |
Tod Kershner and Dale Wood are pleased to announce that onmilitarymatters.com is now taking orders for AOR, 3rd Edition. They expect to begin shipping next week. 150 pages, spiral bound and retails for $49.00 USD. For more info see our Facebook page: warfare in the age of reason by Tod Kershner and Dale Wood |
| Bashytubits | 17 Aug 2016 11:01 a.m. PST |
So what is new and different? Is there any reason owners of the second edition should pony up for the third edition? |
| Toronto48 | 17 Aug 2016 12:08 p.m. PST |
OK I saw your Facebook page and see that there are lots of pretty colour pictures It also says that it's the same basing as 2nd with " some streamlined mechanics", (?) expanded army lists ( historical notes) and changes to campaign systems It also looks like buyers will have to buy additional campaign modules as you only provide one in the book In my opinion AOR was a good Seven Years War set but did not accurately portray Marlburian warfare with its different modes of firing in multiple ranks and different cavalry tactics ( shock vs fire) Using the same basing for both 1705 and 1754 does not seem an effective way to differentiate the two periods What have you done to improve this? If you area asking me to spend close to eighty dollars Canadian you have to show me what do I get other than a lot of pretty pictures. |
| daler240D | 17 Aug 2016 12:28 p.m. PST |
Looking forward to this. It is always painful to view and navigate the OMM website though. |
onmilitarymatters  | 17 Aug 2016 2:22 p.m. PST |
daler240D hi, if you type tod kershner on the search line and enter
you will get all of Tod's rules etc Dennis |
Hal Thinglum  | 17 Aug 2016 2:58 p.m. PST |
Congratulations Tod and Dale! A great set of rules. |
|
ponders nirvana.
