Help support TMP


"Did The Luftwaffe Attack Radar Sites on Malta" Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Aviation Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two in the Air

Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: 1/300 Scale Hot Wheels Blimp

You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.


Featured Profile Article

War at Sea: Task Force Preview

Paul Glasser previews the upcoming expansion set for War at Sea.


785 hits since 12 Aug 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Fatman12 Aug 2016 3:33 p.m. PST

OK the question is fairly self explanatory. I have read dozens of books on he Malta campaign and have even met some of the RAF veterans, however I don't ever remember hearing about any Luftwaffe or Regia Aeronautica attempt to knock out the islands RDF stations. Am I just getting senile or were the Axis really that short sighted? Thanks in advance.

Fatman

Mako1112 Aug 2016 4:36 p.m. PST

Haven't read a lot about Malta, but have some on aerial engagements in the theater there.

My guess is perhaps no, or at least not a concentrated effort to do so, since their attacks on them in Britain were viewed to be "unsuccessful".

Actually, they were successful on occasion in knocking them out, but the British quickly repaired them, and/or put emitters there so the Germans thought they were repaired, even when they weren't, so they abandoned their attacks on them.

Wouldn't be surprised to see that carrying over into the Med. Theater.

Fatman12 Aug 2016 4:53 p.m. PST

Yeah to be honest that's what I thought. I had never really considered it before but our Blues Bears game next year is going to be Malta '42 so I was thinking about targets for the Axis. So airfields, the harbour and shipping are it, makes things more simple for me always a good thing. ;-)

Fatman

Sundance12 Aug 2016 5:41 p.m. PST

I figured pretty much the same thing as Mako. They probably thought it wasn't worth the effort to focus on them so just soldiered on.

Greg G113 Aug 2016 8:21 a.m. PST

I read in one account of life in Malta, by a Maltese teenager of a anti-aircraft gun site being attacked. It was a 3.7" site and one of the guns was hit and destroyed. The radar units were small targets, here is a photo.

link

Fatman13 Aug 2016 9:36 a.m. PST

Greg
I have read of other attacks on gun sites, mostly by "Jabo's". We are using a version of "Wings @ War" from Tumbling Dice so the Guns are factored into the targets they defend. One of the reasons I am glad the RDF wasn't a major target is the fact I don't have to scratch build that radar array in 1/600th. ;)

Fatman

slugbalancer13 Aug 2016 9:54 a.m. PST

Unlike southern England, there wasn't much room for subtlety in air raids on Malta. There was little need to disguise where the attacks were going and the defenders could fairly easily move between targets due to the small size of the island, 122 sq miles. So I guess the radar sites weren't such an important target as the airfields and the port facilites.

Fatman14 Aug 2016 10:38 a.m. PST

The advantage of taking out radar in W@W is it restricts the height and energy interceptors may deploy at. As the RAF player you really don't want youur Spit's at height 2 and energy 2 as the !)('s come in at 4/6!

Fatman

Norman D Landings14 Aug 2016 11:47 p.m. PST

Something the Maltese will tell you cheerfully is that the Italians actually attacked very little on Malta – ditching their payloads in the sea and heading for home to the satisfaction of all concerned.
I'd suggest a morale check at the start of any Italian air raid to determine whether the mission commander intends to press home the attack.

Fatman15 Aug 2016 7:46 a.m. PST

Norman D Landings
Yeah I have come across this before however like most stories like this it is an urban myth. In fact both RAF and Luftwaffe documents of the time comment on the determination of the Regia Aeronautica crews and fighter pilots. The story is probably based on the fact that the Regia Aeronautica stuck with high level bombing using significantly smaller bombs than the Luftwaffe, I think at this stage of the war a 250kg was the largest bomb widely available and 100kg were much more common. This limited damage and increased "scatter" of the bomb loads. because of this I am having two lines for bombing one for the Luftwaffe and a less effective one for the Italians. As an aside in North Africa Luftwaffe bomber and Stuka crews often requested Regia Aeronautica fighter escort. This was because they knew Italian fighters would stick with them while Luftwaffe pilots often left them hanging if they saw the chance to score a kill.

Fatman

Norman D Landings15 Aug 2016 2:28 p.m. PST

Oooooow…. all the good stories turn out to be BS, dammit!

Well, never mind. I'm disillusioned but better informed. Cheers, Fatman!

Fatman15 Aug 2016 4:24 p.m. PST

Sorry my man, however not all the best stories are false, were you aware that standard fittings in Fiat Br 20 bombers were racks to hold bottles of Chianti?

Fatman

Norman D Landings16 Aug 2016 5:53 a.m. PST

Truly, the Mediterranean is the cradle of Western civilisation!

Fatman16 Aug 2016 6:57 a.m. PST

Yup I know RAF types who would say that the RA had it's priorities right.

Fatman

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.