etotheipi | 12 Aug 2016 9:14 a.m. PST |
… not dealing directly with wargaming, should the Editor delete my post as it is dealing with site content and not directly with wargaming? Yes. No. Your mama. |
Todd McLeister | 12 Aug 2016 9:19 a.m. PST |
This is getting silly now. |
Winston Smith | 12 Aug 2016 9:30 a.m. PST |
The consequences of the contradiction could shatter universes. |
Hafen von Schlockenberg | 12 Aug 2016 9:39 a.m. PST |
Oh goody,then we could have a TMP Argument Clinic! "This thread isn't about wargaming!" "Yes it is." "But it hasn't even mentioned the word 'wargaming'!" "Yes it has." "When?" "You mentioned it twice,just now. So,if the thread has 'wargaming' in it,it must,therefore,be about wargaming." "I don't want to argue about that!" "Yes,you do." |
David Manley | 12 Aug 2016 9:56 a.m. PST |
(in uniform so a definite military +> wargaming connection) :) |
Tgerritsen | 12 Aug 2016 10:06 a.m. PST |
If a pig dances a jig while riding a unicycle in a rainstorm does a panda have fleas? |
McKinstry | 12 Aug 2016 10:25 a.m. PST |
As the argument progresses in ever diminishing circles until it vanishes right up its' own * |
Weasel | 12 Aug 2016 10:33 a.m. PST |
I suppose the real question is whether it'd be the first post deleted or the last? |
RavenscraftCybernetics | 12 Aug 2016 11:08 a.m. PST |
|
Mako11 | 12 Aug 2016 11:46 a.m. PST |
Of course, since we expect you to be consistent. |
zoneofcontrol | 12 Aug 2016 11:53 a.m. PST |
My thought is that nobody be allowed to post anything what so ever. This should be a "read only" site. I guess the only downside of that is we'd be reading a lot of reruns. |
Hafen von Schlockenberg | 12 Aug 2016 12:12 p.m. PST |
(Ahem!) Speaking of which, I was debating(internally) whether to repost something that got pushed off the homepage quickly to a somewhat obscure board,before I got a question answered(mainly due to Tango01's Post-DH flood, I have to say). The question wasn't wargame-oriented,so I hesitated to bring it up again. Now I know what to do! |
Mute Bystander | 12 Aug 2016 1:24 p.m. PST |
Some of you guys are absolutely pathetic in your pedantry. And it is not even quality pedantry. |
Goonfighter | 12 Aug 2016 1:39 p.m. PST |
I reckon you'd be OK, after all we've been reliably informed that the editors are very busy and can't look at everything. So there you go…… |
kallman | 12 Aug 2016 3:14 p.m. PST |
|
etotheipi | 12 Aug 2016 4:29 p.m. PST |
And it is not even quality pedantry. Not to be pedantic, but poor quality pedantry is quality pedantry. I believe it is frequent statements of this type that led a nine year old DOM on her first sleepover to respond to my parting comment, "Now I want you to behave." with "I always exhibit behaviour!" |