Help support TMP


"“The army shall not consist of more than — thousand men” " Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Brother Against Brother


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Building Two 1/1200 Scale Vessels

Personal logo Virtualscratchbuilder Supporting Member of TMP Fezian builds a cutter and a corsair, both in 1/1200 scale.


939 hits since 22 Jul 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0122 Jul 2016 10:01 p.m. PST

"When John Francis Mercer arrived late at the Constitutional Convention on 6 Aug 1787, he was only twenty-eight years old—the second youngest man there. But he wasn't shy about speaking up.

The day after Mercer signed in, James Madison's notes portray the young Maryland delegate as saying, "The Constitution is objectionable in many points, but in none more than the present" issue. The next day: "Mr. MERCER expressed his dislike of the whole plan, and his opinion that it never could succeed."

This Teaching American History profile says Mercer attended the convention until 16 August, but Madison recorded him speaking the following day as well. That was his last documented contribution to the debate. But did he stick around silently (or silently enough for Madison not to quote him)?…"
More here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Winston Smith23 Jul 2016 1:54 a.m. PST

So it was discussed. . And voted down unanimously. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Just some "scholar" with the need to publish. Something. Anything.

Dynaman878923 Jul 2016 7:13 a.m. PST

The idea pops up repeatedly up till at least 1812 however. The total distrust of a standing army was understandable.

Supercilius Maximus25 Jul 2016 4:22 a.m. PST

The persistent, blind refusal to see the merits and value of a standing force is equally obvious, though.

Virginia Tory25 Jul 2016 9:56 a.m. PST

We are quite famous for doing that…pretty much all the way up to WW2. And then again before Korea.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.