"Production costs between hard and soft plastic ?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Moldmaking and Casting Message Board
Action Log
21 Jul 2016 3:32 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "Production costs bEtween hard and soft plastic ?" to "Production costs between hard and soft plastic ?"
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile ArticleDo you do so much file work that your fingers hurt? Maybe this tool can help...
|
BelgianRay | 21 Jul 2016 12:01 p.m. PST |
I know you need a fair amount of hard plastic sprues to be sold to get brake even, and once there you can make good money. Is there a diffence if the sprues were soft plastic ? |
BrigadeGames | 21 Jul 2016 12:19 p.m. PST |
Unless one requires more processing time (which is typically seconds in an industrial injection molding machine), the only main difference would be the cost between hard (styrene type plastics) and soft (PP/PE type plastics.) Any cost difference could be outweighed by the reusability of the soft versus no recycling with the hard. I should also say that the biggest cost is the molds, or toolings. The cost to make each one is minuscule compared to the tooling. |
John Treadaway | 21 Jul 2016 1:25 p.m. PST |
As far as I'm aware, the real difference is it's far easier to make one piece figures in soft plastic because they can be popped from the moulds because of the flexible nature of the finished material. Hard plastic figures either have to lose details, be manufactured in a very simple "flat" pose (how many figures can you use doing star jumps? Not many….) or have to be made as multi-part kits with separate arms and so forth. The latter means, I guess, that you get fewer on a sprue and therefor costs (design and manufacturing) probably go up. I get the impression that the small number of pennies in plastic that a sprue costs is next to irrelevant, whether it's hard or soft plastic. John T |
Vigilant | 21 Jul 2016 1:57 p.m. PST |
Also most wargaming companies know the aversion people have to the soft plastic due to the problems with them holding paint. Using soft plastic would not seem to be a good marketing option. |
Bunkermeister | 21 Jul 2016 2:36 p.m. PST |
Vigilant there are tens of thousands of soft plastic figures with most being sold for wargames and diorama builders who paint their figures. Many of the new soft plastics hold paint very well, many of the new paints work on the old soft plastics and many new techniques make painting any soft plastic figure doable. link Don't let metal and hard plastic snobs keep you from painting your soft plastic figures. I generally don't paint mine because I don't like to paint. My metal figures seldom get more than a primer coat and an overspray of a solid color. Mike Bunkermeister Creek Bunker Talk blog |
Green Tiger | 22 Jul 2016 1:44 a.m. PST |
Personally I am far more likely to buy soft plastic rather than hard. I suspect the cost is down to economies of scale (pardon the pun). Soft plastic is produced in large quantity fo r a mass market whereas hard plastic is more specialised. I think they cost about the same to make the moulds. |
VVV reply | 22 Jul 2016 1:44 p.m. PST |
Oh I reckon the cost for a hard plastic mould has dropped a lot. Perhaps £7,000.00 GBP these days. |
|