"Sforzescho versus Braccescho Condottiere Schools? " Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Workbench ArticleDervel returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.
Featured Book Review
|
Prince Alberts Revenge | 20 Jul 2016 1:02 p.m. PST |
Been reading about these two "school", I can grasp the basic premise. Sforza used integrated cavalry and infantry, relied upon constant pressure and used envelop lent of flanks; Braccesscho emphasized cavalry, reserves and quick strikes. If you were a Condottiere, must you belong to one of the schools? We're there hybrids? How often would Condottiere of one school serve with or under a Condottiere of another school? Would these loyalties to a certain school be very strong? Is there a list one can find identifying which Condottiere were affiliated with each school? Thanks! |
Altefritz | 20 Jul 2016 4:49 p.m. PST |
The affiliation was more a political one. The two school (Bracceschi e Sforzeschi) were at the center of a network of allegiances and loyalities. In the XV century Italy this means that if one faction hired "Bracceschi", its opponents would hire "Sforzeschi". I was not able to find a list: however the allegiance was a strong one since at the battle of Poggio Imperiale (1479), were Condottiere of both school were present on the Florentine side, they must be kept separated to prevent infighting. |
cplcampisi | 23 Jul 2016 10:38 p.m. PST |
If I remember correctly, there were Condottieri who could switch between the different styles depending upon tactical considerations. |
Ottoathome | 25 Jul 2016 4:56 a.m. PST |
These distinctions were almost purely literary polemics by the humanists and writers like Machiavelli who knew nothing of war. |
|