"Fortesque on the Utility of Maps" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the 19th Century Media Message Board Back to the Historical Media Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleThe Editor experiments with two of the flocking gel products from Renaissance Ink.
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor takes a virtual tour of Reaper's new offices.
|
M C MonkeyDew | 11 Jul 2016 3:56 p.m. PST |
Been reading Sir John Fortesque's multi volume "History of the British Army" on and off since the 70's. Returned to the preface of the first volume yesterday and among his very thoughtful comments found this: "Maps and plans have been a matter of extreme difficulty owing to the inaccuracy of the old surveys and the disappearance of such fugitive features as marsh and forest I have followed contemporary plans wherever I could in fixing the dispositions of troops but in many cases I should have preferred to have presented the reader with a map of the ground only and left him to fill in the troops for himself from the description in the text Blocks of red and blue are pleasing indeed to the eye but it is always a question whether their facility for misleading does not exceed their utility for guidance Actual visits to many of the battlefields of the Low Countries with the maps of so recent a writer as Coxe in my hand did not encourage me in my belief in the system although in deference to the vast majority of my advisers I have pursued it" Coxe wrote a history of Marlborough published in 1818 by the way. So what do you all think? I'm sure the great man is right but I'm glad he listened to his advisers. Certainly has made setting up scenarios easy :) Bob |
|