Editor in Chief Bill | 13 Jun 2016 5:20 p.m. PST |
As you voted – TMP link – a Dawghousing for a Personal Attack can now be rescinded if the victim says he was not offended. The TMP FAQ has been updated accordingly. |
Winston Smith | 13 Jun 2016 5:49 p.m. PST |
And there was much rejoicing… If I am not offended, where's the crime? |
R Brown | 13 Jun 2016 6:39 p.m. PST |
LMAO. Yep…this matters on TMP. "I'm offended that you were not offended". |
Lee Brilleaux | 13 Jun 2016 6:51 p.m. PST |
The OFM and I will now start a session of calling one another names, on the understanding that the other will proclaim his under-offendedness. |
RavenscraftCybernetics | 13 Jun 2016 7:18 p.m. PST |
so do we need a Saul Goodman button next to the complaint button? |
Korvessa | 13 Jun 2016 8:12 p.m. PST |
This would never fly in court or in a Internal Affairs Investigation |
Tango01 | 13 Jun 2016 9:16 p.m. PST |
About implementation… how is this going on? Example: X person wrote a personal attack about W person… -Bill takes note and ask W person if he is ok with that?. -Or if W person does not complain… not crime by X person? -If another fellow member complain… Bill ask W person what to do?… -No matter what X person have wrote? (for example an xenophobe hate attack)… W person is allowed to pardon him?. -The rest of TMP community should know this or everything ended in the private sphere?… Thanks in advance for your guidance. Amicalement Armand |
Winston Smith | 13 Jun 2016 10:09 p.m. PST |
Senor squint. Ahem. You are like a stream of bat's . You shine out like a shaft of gold when all around is dark. |
Winston Smith | 13 Jun 2016 10:11 p.m. PST |
Come on Jack… Don't let me down! |
Weasel | 13 Jun 2016 10:40 p.m. PST |
Well hey, democracy in action |
R Brown | 13 Jun 2016 10:55 p.m. PST |
Good grief… You're already calling each other names.. The TMP CircleJerk continues. |
Legion 4 | 14 Jun 2016 5:51 a.m. PST |
Let's see if or how well this rule works. But I do see it as a positive move … but we'll see. I'm in the DH so often, I can't remember what I said to get there … But No matter what the "new rules". I'm sure the powers that be will find a way to "Send me up river " … again. |
Lee Brilleaux | 14 Jun 2016 6:36 a.m. PST |
John tells me he has some stuff to put up on the marketplace before we can get down to the hail of abuse. Slack-jawed turniphead that he is. |
Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2016 7:43 a.m. PST |
Note that Dear Editor Bill says "can be rescinded", and not that it will be. It's a mitigating factor in the sentencing. He will not draw and quarter you, but you still get 40 lashes. Lest one. |
Weasel | 14 Jun 2016 7:48 a.m. PST |
well, make sure you've done all relevant posting before you test the new waters ;) |
Big Red | 14 Jun 2016 8:24 a.m. PST |
Every thing you type can and will be used against you – third party intervention or no. |
Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2016 8:28 a.m. PST |
I can also trick Senor Squint into insulting me, and then leave him in the lurch! Bwahahahaha! |
javelin98 | 14 Jun 2016 10:16 a.m. PST |
This is why we can't have nice threads. |
Tommy20 | 14 Jun 2016 10:31 a.m. PST |
Speak for yourself! I think this suit is rather dashing! |
Hafen von Schlockenberg | 14 Jun 2016 11:28 a.m. PST |
|
Ed Mohrmann | 14 Jun 2016 12:07 p.m. PST |
no, it's 'black slacks with a cat chain down to the knees' |
Gunfreak | 14 Jun 2016 3:31 p.m. PST |
What happens if i call ny self an asshole. Then complain about my self to bill. Will i break TMP |
Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2016 6:05 p.m. PST |
There is still profanity that is now not bleeped but gets you the DH anyway. |
Legion 4 | 15 Jun 2016 6:19 a.m. PST |
So pretty much things will generally remain the same … overall. |
Winston Smith | 15 Jun 2016 9:45 a.m. PST |
Gunfreak, what if John the OFM insulted me? |
Tango01 | 15 Jun 2016 10:43 a.m. PST |
None of my questions were answered… (smile) Amicalement Armand |
Legion 4 | 15 Jun 2016 11:48 a.m. PST |
Good question John … err … Winston ?!? |
Gunfreak | 15 Jun 2016 2:04 p.m. PST |
Gunfreak, what if John the OFM insulted me? John Smith would get dog housed |
Editor in Chief Bill | 15 Jun 2016 3:26 p.m. PST |
About implementation… how is this going on? Hasn't come up yet. Example: X person wrote a personal attack about W person…-Bill takes note and ask W person if he is ok with that?.
No way, too much time. -Or if W person does not complain… not crime by X person? No, we'll still flag personal attacks as before. -If another fellow member complain… Bill ask W person what to do?… No -No matter what X person have wrote? (for example an xenophobe hate attack)… W person is allowed to pardon him?. We'll exercise discretion in the extreme situations. |
Tango01 | 17 Jun 2016 11:52 a.m. PST |
Many thanks Bill!… Amicalement Armand |