"Weapons of WWII - Compared and Contrasted (M.E. Haskew)" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Media Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land World War Two at Sea World War Two in the Air
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThese "puzzle tanks" are good quality for the cost.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
ArmymenRGreat | 11 Jun 2016 1:25 p.m. PST |
Anyone else willing to admit they like this book? It's full of errors, the charts aren't to scale, and some of the comparisons are downright bizarre, but it's well illustrated and a FUN book to read. It's one of my go-to books when I'm waiting for something and only have 10 minutes. |
jdginaz | 11 Jun 2016 4:26 p.m. PST |
Never heard of it but it sounds like a waste of time. |
ArmymenRGreat | 11 Jun 2016 5:42 p.m. PST |
If perfect details are more important to you than overall enjoyment, that's probably true. It does arrange and compare weapons in a way I've never seen elsewhere. |
jdginaz | 13 Jun 2016 11:51 p.m. PST |
Yeah a book "full of errors" is not one that is going to give me as much overall enjoyment as overall frustration. To ach his own. |
hindsTMP | 14 Jun 2016 6:16 a.m. PST |
Maybe he's saying that the book contains useful insights, even though some of the detail is off? So he reads the book for the insights. MH |
ArmymenRGreat | 14 Jun 2016 8:50 p.m. PST |
"Insights" is close. Maybe "arrangement" is a better description of what attracts me to this book. It provides a framework that encourages further research, hence the fact that I'm not overly put off by the errors. The reason I posted was to see if anyone else overlooked the errors (and coffee table style) and appreciated the book. |
|