Help support TMP


"Weapons of WWII - Compared and Contrasted (M.E. Haskew)" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Hordes of the Things


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Christmas Stocking Stuffer for Armor Fans

These "puzzle tanks" are good quality for the cost.


Featured Workbench Article

Blind Old Hag's Do-It-Yourself Flight Stands

How Blind Old Hag Fezian makes flight stands for 1/300 scale aircraft.


Featured Profile Article

Mal Wright's Akagi at Midway

Mal Wright Fezian's commission from one of our own.


Featured Book Review


884 hits since 11 Jun 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

ArmymenRGreat11 Jun 2016 1:25 p.m. PST

Anyone else willing to admit they like this book? It's full of errors, the charts aren't to scale, and some of the comparisons are downright bizarre, but it's well illustrated and a FUN book to read.

It's one of my go-to books when I'm waiting for something and only have 10 minutes.

jdginaz11 Jun 2016 4:26 p.m. PST

Never heard of it but it sounds like a waste of time.

ArmymenRGreat11 Jun 2016 5:42 p.m. PST

If perfect details are more important to you than overall enjoyment, that's probably true.

It does arrange and compare weapons in a way I've never seen elsewhere.

jdginaz13 Jun 2016 11:51 p.m. PST

Yeah a book "full of errors" is not one that is going to give me as much overall enjoyment as overall frustration. To ach his own.

hindsTMP Supporting Member of TMP14 Jun 2016 6:16 a.m. PST

Maybe he's saying that the book contains useful insights, even though some of the detail is off? So he reads the book for the insights. MH

ArmymenRGreat14 Jun 2016 8:50 p.m. PST

"Insights" is close. Maybe "arrangement" is a better description of what attracts me to this book. It provides a framework that encourages further research, hence the fact that I'm not overly put off by the errors.

The reason I posted was to see if anyone else overlooked the errors (and coffee table style) and appreciated the book.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.