Help support TMP


"BB Littorio Punta Stilo/Calabria Question" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Small Scale Ships with M.Y. Miniatures

Mal Wright Fezian's first experience with 1:4800 scale naval models.


Featured Profile Article

War at Sea First Game

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian tries the naval wargame in the Axis & Allies series.


Featured Book Review


725 hits since 31 May 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
codiver31 May 2016 12:47 p.m. PST

I was looking at doing a Punta Stilo/Calabria "what if" scenario, where the Italian fleet is augmented by the battleships Littorio and Vittorio Veneto.

I know they were still working up, and there is a sentence on page 69 of The Naval War in the Mediterranean 1940-1943 by Jack Greene & Alessandro Massignani that says "But there had been an electrical fire in one of Littorio's main turrets the previous day, killing one civilian worker and causing damage which would need a month's work to repair."

My question is, which turret? Anyone have a source that identifies it?

Unfortunately the endnote in The Naval War in the Mediterranean 1940-1943 seems to focus on a subsequent sentence on how it was likely the ships could have been able to reach the fleet in time.

hindsTMP Supporting Member of TMP31 May 2016 9:00 p.m. PST

According the the recent book "The Littorio Class", a fire occurred in turret #1 on July 7, 1940, which seriously damaged it. Although both ships were apparently considered to be on stand by for the battle of Punta Stilo, they were still working up during this period. A contemporary report estimated them to be capable of only 60-65% effectiveness, due to various unresolved technical issues.

MH

codiver02 Jun 2016 6:51 a.m. PST

MH,

Thanks for the info. Lonnie Gill responded similarly to my post on the ODGW forum, adding (I believe from the same source as yours) "Turret #2 was also out of action for a few days due to flooding during a violent storm and not available on 9 July if she had actually sailed to take part in the battle."

I personally can't see the Italians committing Littorio with only her stern turret operable, so unless Vittorio Veneto had specific issues beyond the, as you put it, "60-65% effectiveness, due to various unresolved technical issues", I'm leaning towards just including Vittorio Veneto, with some rules similar to what I would use to simulate Prince of Wales problems against Bismarck.

Or maybe part of the "what if" will be that both ships had completed their working up…

Dave

hindsTMP Supporting Member of TMP02 Jun 2016 8:42 a.m. PST

2 quotations of interest, from pages 165 and 166 of the same book:

"Added to that, on 5 July a violent storm caused considerable flooding in Littorio's Number 2 turret, rendering it unusable for a few days. To make matters worse there was an accident in the Number 1 turret two days later."

"Despite this, their participation was considered, as on 8-9 July the two battleships were made ready to sail in case of extreme need, even though Littorio had two 381mm turrets out of action.

FWIW, I get the impression that the "60-65 per cent" (per Admiral Bergamini) takes into account a single turret being out, presumably Turret #1 on Littorio, as Turret #2 was only out for "a few days". So 5 turrets out of 6 for the pair gives 83%, with the remainder of the reduction presumably due to other teething troubles with the main armament. In GQ terms, this would be armament boxes, modeled probabilistically. .

Mark H.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.