"Xuvaxi Commissioner, Enforcer and Regulator" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Spaceship Gaming Message Board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Profile Article
Featured Movie Review
|
Tango01 | 04 May 2016 12:13 p.m. PST |
Xuvaxi Commissioner "The Xuvaxi Commissioner prototype was a failure – fragile and often breaking down within spacedock. With the typical speed and agility of the Xuvaxi bureaucracy, a streamlined and more reliable ship was delivered a few years later. Mission-wise, the Commissioner is a VIP hauler, delivering mid-level chancellors adroitly to red-tape trouble spots within Xuvaxi space. In a pinch, the Commissioner can be used as a reasonably powerful combatant"
link Xuvaxi Enforcer "The original Enforcer class was effective, but operating costs kept them tied to Xuvaxi naval bases and soured the leadership on their continued construction. When a Ngaksu strike force hit the Enforcer's main shipyards, a hasty redesign was put into production. The new second-generation Enforcer has already dominated more combat action than its obsolete older sibling"
link Xuvaxi Regulator "Due to unforseen errors in design and construction, far too many Xuvaxi Regulators had been disintigrated, melted, collapsed or assassinated before their time. The redesigned Regulator is stronger and a smidgen faster, thanks to a more compact design related to the successful Aggressor class ships. With the new Regulators entering service, the Xuvaxi hope they'll last long enough to justify their excessive budgets"
link Amicalement Armand |
15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 04 May 2016 1:31 p.m. PST |
|
Tango01 | 05 May 2016 10:25 a.m. PST |
Agree!. (smile) Amicalement Armand |
emckinney | 05 May 2016 11:19 a.m. PST |
You should have see the PRE-DCMA take – down versions. (Nothing close to being rip-off, but and "inspired by" aesthetic.) |
Sargonarhes | 08 May 2016 3:28 p.m. PST |
Is studio bergstrom still making the older designs? |
|