Help support TMP


"'Flint and Feather' Kickstarter live" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Not found! Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Little Yellow Clamps

Need some low-pressure clamps?


Featured Profile Article

Gen Con So Cal 2006 Report

Wyatt the Odd Fezian reports from the final California Gen Con...


Current Poll


883 hits since 4 May 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Lee Brilleaux Fezian04 May 2016 7:47 a.m. PST

The campaign for 'Flint and Feather' has started. This is Bob Murch of Pulp Figures labour of love, in cooperation with Lee Van Schaik as 'Crucible Crush'. The rules are by the Pulp Action Library team of Roderick Robertson and, ahem, me.

link

This is not one of those 'we need to make a million dollars' Kickstarters. There are no blockbuster movies or comic books about the conflict between the Hurons and Iroquois. It's an unusual topic aimed at a discerning audience.

Bob's made the models, and will make some more. The rules are written and playtested, but we'd like others to give them their input. We want to produce a genuinely nice book, with cards and tokens. Plus a longhouse for Bob's garden.

axabrax04 May 2016 8:01 a.m. PST

Already signed up at the Great Warrior level! Shouldn't this be a Hobby News item rather than just buried as a post? You should be as loud about it as possible >;-)

Lee Brilleaux Fezian04 May 2016 8:11 a.m. PST

I'm sure a proper announcement is coming. I just wanted to mention it now.

Cullen04 May 2016 8:20 a.m. PST

Excellent sculpts! 'Hope it goes well.

Cheers, RC.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2016 8:30 a.m. PST

The sculpts are very nice. I was surprised to see the gunstock clubs since the majority of scholars believe this is a post contact weapon.

Winston Smith04 May 2016 8:37 a.m. PST

I love the Indians Bob Murch sculpted for RAFM back in the previous century. Too bad they are so tiny in comparison with more "modern" sculpts.

Personal logo Stosstruppen Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2016 10:09 a.m. PST

Might have to get in on this….

Disco Joe04 May 2016 11:18 a.m. PST

Since I got the figures that were available to purchase at Histoicon last year I will wait until the others are available to get and then buy them.

Raynman Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2016 2:21 p.m. PST

Signed up for the Great Warrior level too. I am looking forward to these figures.

zippyfusenet05 May 2016 10:14 a.m. PST

My opinion here, JJ…

In pre-state societies, where no one compelled anyone else to fight, men always fought basically for social prestige, i.e., 'honor'. Social prestige pays off for men, mainly, in mating opportunities – in can get girls. True, we may get only one wife at a time, but we have to be worthy of her, her mother, aunts and sisters all have to approve of us, or we're not getting any.

Now, 'honor' might come from making insane displays of courage and defeating opponents in hand-to-hand contests of speed and strength. Or, then again, it might come from being so evilly crafty as to never give an opponent a fair chance.

My understanding is that once it became clear that a one-ounce lead ball could kill the mightiest hero, the balance shifted away from brave displays and toward deadly cunning.

But, as late as the 1760s, some Rangers reported a crazy, *big* Indian jumping in among them and wreaking havoc with his warclub. They shot him right down. Of course.

Guthroth05 May 2016 11:33 a.m. PST

Does anyone know if these figures would be suitable for the period 1000 – 1100 ?

zippyfusenet05 May 2016 12:55 p.m. PST

I have several answers to that question.

On the one hand, I think the F&F figures would be reasonable to use for Great Lakes Iroquoians c. 1000 AD.

But. If you're thinking of using them for Newfoundland Skraelings, Newfoundland is a good 800 miles from Lake Ontario. Best evidence from archaeology and from the sagas is that those Skraelings were probably Dorset culture Arctic people, the culture that preceded the modern Innuit, or possibly proto-Beothuk Indians. They might have looked some different from Iroquois, might have worn arctic-style parka, trousers and mukluks rather than breechclout, leggings and moccasins.

On the third hand, who's going to stop you? The F&F figures are at least as plausible as some of the sculpts I've seen specifically labelled as Skraelings.

zippyfusenet05 May 2016 7:34 p.m. PST

Great links JJ, thank you.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.