Help support TMP


"28mm Republican Romans, Basing" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Basing Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Armati


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Stuff It! (In a Box)

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian worries about not losing his rules stuff.


Featured Workbench Article

Paint Your Paint Pots

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian has a tip to help with your paint storage (and recognition).


Featured Profile Article

GameCon '98

The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).


Current Poll


2,575 hits since 25 Apr 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Lucius25 Apr 2016 3:32 p.m. PST

I've got a 20-year-old matched pair of Foundry Republican Roman/Carthaginian armies that I'm breathing new life into by re-basing and adding shield transfers. They are currently mounted WRG-style, about 700 figures total.

I've been following the thread on Republican Roman rules with interest. I'm open to trying to find something to make them seem more, well, Roman.

So the question is:

Should I mount the Romans 1 x 4(rectangular), as in the the old WRG basing, or should I mount them 2 x 2, on square bases? It seemed like heresy to me at first, but I'm warming to the square basing idea. It seems like it would give me more flexibility.

Individual basing is out, and I've never been a fan of movement trays/sabots. So if you only had two options, 1x4 basing, or 2x2 basing, which way would you go?

Phillius Sponsoring Member of TMP25 Apr 2016 5:31 p.m. PST

I think, as do other gaming buddies, that the 2x2 approach has a lot going for it.
Using the wonderful sabots from Shogun Miniatures, you could use them for To The Strongest, Impetus, or many other sets (or just go without sabots if you really don't like them).
All of my ancients and early Italian Wars figures are based for DBx, which I enjoy, but they don't have the flexibility.

Johnp400025 Apr 2016 5:32 p.m. PST

I always find the 2 x 2 option is the most flexible, fortunately nowadays rules aren't always as strict to base sizes as in the WRG days.I tend to play WAB and sometimes Hail Caesar and this base size fits both with no problems.

Oregon01 Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2016 6:16 p.m. PST

2 X 2. Triarii you may want to go one deep as I believe (from memory so double check) they deployed in half the depth of the other heavy infantry.

gavandjosh0226 Apr 2016 2:42 a.m. PST

yes – reportedly 3 ranks vs. 6 (but fewer in number so same frontage).

Personal logo BigRedBat Sponsoring Member of TMP26 Apr 2016 4:17 a.m. PST

I think the 2x2 but with shallower triarii 2x1 would work nicely. You might even try 4x2 and 4x1- bigger bases save time and wear when getting the minis on the table.

Mars Ultor26 Apr 2016 5:45 a.m. PST

2x2 works well for no movement tray

Decebalus26 Apr 2016 6:38 a.m. PST

I am a big fan of BigRedBats basing style, i.e. WRG width but more depth.

I base 6cm wide and 5cm deep, using from 5 to 8 miniatures. It looks really good and is even usable for DBA:

Personal logo BigRedBat Sponsoring Member of TMP26 Apr 2016 6:48 a.m. PST

I've been kicking around a different basing idea for a similar task that lies ahead of me.

I'm thinking of basing 7-8 hastati along with 3-4 velites on the same 10cm wide, 8cm deep base. The velites would be in front and to the right of the hastati. 10 such units would form the front line of the legion. Behind them would be principes, each on the right of a similar sized base so as to cover the gaps in the front line. The triarii would be on a much shallower base to the rear, in a single rank.

Essentially the hastati and associated velites would act as a single unit with both javelin and melee capabilites, as would the principes/velites.

Big bases, though; probably not what you are after!

Personal logo BigRedBat Sponsoring Member of TMP26 Apr 2016 6:49 a.m. PST

ps thanks Decebalus.

Lucius26 Apr 2016 6:56 a.m. PST

Thanks to all!

I'm finally liberated from WRG basing.

Which is strange, because I never played WRG games, but played Tactica and Armati instead. At any rate, I'm looking forward to experimenting with my 2x2 Roman army.

Oregon01 – thanks for the suggestion on keeping the triarii in one line.

Soldat26 Apr 2016 7:04 p.m. PST

I based all my Romans on washers. So if I want to rebase them all I need are new bases with sabot holes.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.