| Ottoathome | 14 Apr 2016 5:37 a.m. PST |
I started this entry because if you are, you'll never get it. I saw the title and refuse to open the thread. The title alone is enough to say all that I could say. |
| nazrat | 14 Apr 2016 6:09 a.m. PST |
Yeah, that thread about the Canadian moose figure is VERY provocative! |
| tberry7403 | 14 Apr 2016 6:41 a.m. PST |
I started this entry because if you are, you'll never get it. Uh… You do realize this IS a comment?  |
Joes Shop  | 14 Apr 2016 6:49 a.m. PST |
So you refused to open the thread: so what – that's your choice on any thread on this site. Why post about it? Why do you need the attention? |
| GarrisonMiniatures | 14 Apr 2016 7:18 a.m. PST |
The reason for posting is because Otto is trolling for comments? |
| Joes Shop | 14 Apr 2016 7:19 a.m. PST |
|
| Chuckaroobob | 14 Apr 2016 7:27 a.m. PST |
"'Knife him, knife that ump!' wailed some crazy left field clown." to quote Mad magazine from 35 years ago.
Now that's a comment! |
| Winston Smith | 14 Apr 2016 7:51 a.m. PST |
Nice job Otto. You succeeded in getting me to see what you were talking about. |
 javelin98 | 14 Apr 2016 7:55 a.m. PST |
Wouldn't this thread itself violate the no-trolling rule? Seems rather ironic. |
| Ottoathome | 14 Apr 2016 8:51 a.m. PST |
Dear Winston Thanks, glad I could be of service. My point is that I do not care to see such ugliness. No matter What it was, it was bound to be gross and unpleasant. The title says it all and I want none of it. Javelin98 No, I'm not trolling to start an argument, though you seem to be. Armand is a friend and he usually makes wry comments on mine, so I didn't want him to be disappointed. He'd be pining for it. So I made a second thread, the only way to do it. 
|
| Tango01 | 14 Apr 2016 11:02 a.m. PST |
?????????????????????… I can get it!… anyone can explain me…??????? Amicalement
Armand |
| John the Greater | 14 Apr 2016 11:29 a.m. PST |
Wouldn't this thread itself violate the no-trolling rule? Are there rules against meta-trolling? Oh, and nice boots, by the way, but the weapon is too large. As usual. |
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 14 Apr 2016 11:59 a.m. PST |
anyone can explain me…??????? People have been trying to explain you for years, Armand.  |
| Tango01 | 14 Apr 2016 12:11 p.m. PST |
Ha!…Ha!… good one Bill!… (smile) Amicalement
Armand |
| Tgerritsen | 14 Apr 2016 12:49 p.m. PST |
Ok, I'm confused. Is this actually about the Canadian Moose miniature? The one with a miniature of a moose? Just a moose. No naked weird moose woman or moose monster, just a moose? That thread? Otto, it's a moose. Nothing weird about it. Just a moose. If you are talking about that weird cockroach woman…yeah, that was weird. |
| Lupulus | 14 Apr 2016 2:41 p.m. PST |
People have been trying to explain you for years, Armand. PWNED! |
 etotheipi  | 15 Apr 2016 1:28 p.m. PST |
I am just glad the Lord High Editcutioner added the comma. |
