"Crusader/1st Corp size comparrison?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Beowulf  paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.
Featured Workbench Article Mini-Dragon tackles hundreds of pre-cast pieces to build the Temple Entrance.
Featured Profile Article The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).
Featured Book Review
|
| HarryHotspurEsq | 03 Apr 2016 7:36 a.m. PST |
How do these two 28mm ancients ranges compare please? I am looking at mixing Hellenistic bits and pieces. Cheers! |
| Marcus Brutus | 03 Apr 2016 11:11 a.m. PST |
Generally speaking they don't really match up well. 1st Corp is a bit smaller and has a more refined style. Crusader is larger and has a more chunky look. Units in the same army are fine to my eye but not in the same unit. I do like both lines a lot. |
| Codsticker | 03 Apr 2016 12:50 p.m. PST |
Oh I thought the Crusader were the short ones? Definitely chunky though… |
| HarryHotspurEsq | 03 Apr 2016 1:16 p.m. PST |
Cheers. So maybe a unit 1st Corp Macedonians would be fine along side a unit of Crusader Thracians, but not mixing Macs from the two lines in one unit? |
| Marcus Brutus | 04 Apr 2016 6:35 a.m. PST |
Yes, I would agree with that Hotspur. I have Crusader Punic Romans for the most part but have one unit of 1st Corp Principes and they look fine on the table top together. 1st Corp Punic Romans are definitely a bit shorter and a lot slimmer than Crusader. |
|
