Help support TMP


"Sherburne's additional" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 18th Century Gallery Message Board

Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Loose Files and American Scramble


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


Featured Book Review


1,588 hits since 2 Apr 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

maciek7202 Apr 2016 8:18 a.m. PST

Especially, I'd like to know what do you think about my interpretation of Gostelowe no 6.

link

Winston Smith02 Apr 2016 8:39 a.m. PST

The Gostelowe flags were first mentioned in an inventory return in 1778.
Sherburne's additional regiment existed in this time frame. Lefferts mentions they were mainly drawn from Connecticut men.
I am not near my Richardson, but is the flag you chose consistent with Connecticut?

Winston Smith02 Apr 2016 8:44 a.m. PST

Oh. I see you quoted Lefferts on your blog. grin

maciek7202 Apr 2016 9:25 a.m. PST

Device on flag was copied from Continental $4 USD Bill (and mine is exact copy of it )


It has no association with any state.

Winston Smith02 Apr 2016 10:44 a.m. PST

I think you're good then. It has period "heraldry".

We are in the dark with about 95% of all American AWI flags, and your design is as good an educated guess as any. Heck, most of Richardson's Gostelowe flags are conjecture.

maciek7202 Apr 2016 11:03 a.m. PST

The only two things I changed from Richardson's version were:
- a blue canton
- wildboar in natural color
Both inspired with Waxhaws' colours

Generalstoner4902 Apr 2016 11:11 a.m. PST

Nicely done! Sherburne's additional regiment is my favorite continental regiment.

maciek7202 Apr 2016 12:17 p.m. PST

Combination of brown, green and yellow is unbeatable.

Supercilius Maximus03 Apr 2016 4:43 a.m. PST

At the risk of being a "party pooper" this uniform was only worn from early 1779, late 1778 at best, and may well have been the last – of several – uniforms worn by the regiment, as it was disbanded in early 1780. As such, this uniform was probably never worn in combat, and quite possibly may not have been worn by the entire regiment.

Formed in 1777, from CT and RI men (and possibly some MD men later on) there is no official uniform listed for the regiment; the dress maciek has depicted comes from five deserters in Jan/Feb 1779, so is as close as we're likely to get. In 1777, a deserter was recorded in a "light" coloured coat faced red, and in mid-1778, a single deserter in a blue coat faced white, are the best anyone has managed to find for the earlier period. In 1780, it was combined with Samuel Webb's regiment (also from CT), which later became the 9th CT regiment, and finally the 3rd FT regiment of 1781 until the war's end.

Winston Smith03 Apr 2016 6:34 a.m. PST

And your point is????? grin
And I can dress the 23rd Royal Welch Fusiliers in at least 4 different uniforms, depending on the year.
No one in his right mind will have the proper uniforms for each uniform at every stage of the war.
Note my use of "in his right mind". I am talking about wargamers.

dBerczerk03 Apr 2016 9:44 a.m. PST

I'm not a big fan of figures in the more diminutive scales, but I like your interpretation of Gostelowe no. 6!

maciek7203 Apr 2016 10:59 a.m. PST

@SM
:)
I think I must live with informations you provided.

Thanks for all kind comments, guys.

Supercilius Maximus04 Apr 2016 2:39 a.m. PST

It wasn't meant to be a criticism, just so people are aware.

Your figures, your rules – very nicely painted, just a shame it's not a bigger unit.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.