"Scots pikes don't skirmish?" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
Featured Workbench ArticleDervel returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.
Featured Profile ArticleOur man in Jerusalem reports on the sights of Crusader-era Jerusalem.
Featured Movie Review
|
JSears | 31 Mar 2016 11:52 a.m. PST |
Hi all. Working on matched armies for Scottish wars of Edward I/II Planning on some pike armed scots for big set piece battle, but those same figures probably can't be used for small skirmishes/border raids correct? I'd think a pike armed schiltron would only work when you had a whole mess of guys packed close together. For a skirmish (say Lion Rampant) with a few dozen individuals per side I'd assume both English and Scots would use identical gear (spears, swords, maces, axes, some bows) with nary a long pike in sight. Are my assumptions correct? |
miniMo | 31 Mar 2016 1:56 p.m. PST |
Lance or long spear is an essential weapon in Border Reiving. Not likely used in a schiltron, but a very long pointy stick is very useful when skirmishing against someone on horseback, or defending a stairway, and many other circumstance where you jut want to poke somebody with a long pointy stick. |
Great War Ace | 31 Mar 2016 2:22 p.m. PST |
Pikes can be used singly, until the opponent gets past the point. Skirmish rules should handle that. A simple method is to assume that "longest attacks first". If longest doesn't drive back (at the very least), then the shorter weapon gets "inside" and has the advantage unless, or until, the longer weapon can reestablish range advantage…. |
majormike69 | 01 Apr 2016 4:15 a.m. PST |
If for Lion Rampant it just becomes a spear. |
Sundance | 01 Apr 2016 5:53 a.m. PST |
Pointy sticks? Harharhar. Don't make me laugh! |
Lee Brilleaux | 01 Apr 2016 11:52 a.m. PST |
I imagine that pikemen would, if possible, replace their long weapon for something more convenient when foraging / patrolling / bothering the locals – even if it was simply to go with their own side weapon alone. After all, in WWII the mortar crew didn't get out of sentry duty because they couldn't carry the base of a 3" mortar along with them. |
Not A Member Anymore | 01 Apr 2016 10:12 p.m. PST |
If memory serves the schiltrons at the time of the Wars of Independence used long spears not pikes. The pikes were introduced from the Continent shortly before Flodden in the 15th Century after the success of the Flemish fighting the Burgundians. John |
uglyfatbloke | 06 Apr 2016 11:58 a.m. PST |
Correct in initial supposition JSears. Big battles were few and far between – almost all the fighting was done by small units of mounted men-at-arms ('knights' in DBA) so what you need is early HYW armoured cavalry for both sides. The army lists for Lion Rampant are best ignored – at least for Scottish and English forces. |
|