Help support TMP


"Intermediate Troop Quality in Chain of Command" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board

Back to the WWII Rules Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


1,399 hits since 28 Feb 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Pyrrhic Victory28 Feb 2016 5:06 p.m. PST

Folks,

I've been thinking about troop quality in Chain of Command of late and whether making it a bit more granular might be a good thing. D6 based systems necessarily make the effect of a +1 change very large, but there may be some ways to smooth the steps out a bit. I have a blog post up with my thoughts here: link

Take a look and let me know what you think!

Ed

steamingdave4729 Feb 2016 9:33 a.m. PST

Experienced Green? Surely a contradiction in terms?

No longer can support TMP29 Feb 2016 9:55 a.m. PST

Substitute the word poor for green. Experienced poor troops is possible. Basically, troops that have been in combat for far too long and have burnt out. The kills on them might not be an actual kill but them finding nice quiet area to hide while the shooting is going on and then putting their hands up once it has ended if they are on the wrong side of the lines.

RetroBoom29 Feb 2016 11:52 a.m. PST

Worthy exercise, Ed. Thanks for sharing. I would be compelled to keep considering a technique that wouldn't require an additional roll with new target numbers.

Pyrrhic Victory29 Feb 2016 1:36 p.m. PST

Agreed on the pain of having the extra die roll. I'd love to find a way that didn't require them and didn't introduce complications elsewhere,

The other approach I played around with was modifying the number of firing dice, but since the relationships from green to regular and regular to Elite are different and also vary between range bands, this jus seemed simpler to implement.

Thanks!
Ed

Weasel29 Feb 2016 3:08 p.m. PST

"Reluctant veteran" might be a better term

Pyrrhic Victory29 Feb 2016 3:57 p.m. PST

Agreed. The progression really should be Green-Trained-Regular-Veteran-Elite, or something like that. However, you're stuck with the terminology you inherit, it seemed better to create a single modifier rather than two new "quality grades". That said, I agree "Experienced Green" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue….

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.