"GW v. Front Rank Horses - comparable size?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board Back to the Warhammer Message Board
Areas of InterestFantasy
Medieval
18th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Workbench Article Adam loves Scorched Brown...
Featured Profile Article
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
YogiBearMinis  | 11 Feb 2016 5:42 a.m. PST |
I have some and the Front Rank are a touch too small to use together with any of the plastic GW horses. Some of Redoubt's horses can work, and BTD's Helsinian armored horse matches the Empire plastic armored horse. |
| Frederick | 11 Feb 2016 9:44 a.m. PST |
Agree that the GW plastic horses are a bit large – even compared to old school GW metal horses |
| YogiBearMinis | 11 Feb 2016 10:42 a.m. PST |
I am thinking of mounting my Kislev horse archers on smaller plastic horses, like Perry or Conquest. I am going to mount my Kislave lancers on the newer Pistolier horses. I am then going to use those unarmored GW horses for Pistoliers and other medium cavalry riders I make from scratch or buy off other manufacturers (like Front Rank for Bretonnian or Empire yeoman). |
|
ponders nirvana.
