Help support TMP


"Elamite Chariot from Eureka" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Gallery Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Current Poll


1,054 hits since 4 Feb 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

colin knight04 Feb 2016 4:59 a.m. PST

At last got round to finishing the base on an Elamite chariot. This is from the nicely sculpted 28mm range from Eureka.
I added extra horses for 4 horse look and have another 3 in progress. This is my slow advance towards To The Strongest army which will face the nasty Assyrians.

chariotgamer.blogspot.com

mwindsorfw04 Feb 2016 6:10 a.m. PST

Did Elamites use horses, or did they onagers like the Sumerians?

Dschebe04 Feb 2016 9:04 a.m. PST

Hi Mike,

These elamites are intended for a later period (1st millenium BC) than sumerian civilization (4th-2nd millenia BC).

Very nice, Colin.

GarrisonMiniatures04 Feb 2016 9:06 a.m. PST

Onagers as far as I know.

mwindsorfw04 Feb 2016 9:14 a.m. PST

Thanks, Dschebe. Once I get past 1000 BC, my timeline gets a bit fuzzy. I hear "Elamites" and group them with a whole bunch of "-ites" and "-ns", and think "that's a long, long time ago."

colin knight04 Feb 2016 10:54 a.m. PST

They can be small horses or mules I believe. This model probably has mules but look like horses also to me.

Mules sound less threatening than horses :) Update…Model description states donkeys. Onagers are a wild related species.

Personal logo Mister Tibbles Supporting Member of TMP04 Feb 2016 11:14 a.m. PST

Very nicely done. I have a soft spot for chariots and love following the blog.

BTW every time I see "onagers" I keep thinking Roman artillery. Drives me nuts! LOL

Dschebe04 Feb 2016 11:50 a.m. PST

Hi Colin,

There is a variety of possibilities for these animals. Of course they can be mules or donkeys in case you only use them for transport purpose, I think. Why do I think they should better be little horses?

War chariotry in the 8-7th centuries BC (the date of your model depicted) had been using horses for almost a thousand years. At least from the distant times the hurrites, luvites, hitites and others entered the scene in the Middle East with their two wheeled, two horses chariots.

At this time (8-7th centuries BC) horse drawn chariots were of general use and real cavalry was spreading. That's why I think that a war chariot drawn by donkeys or mules should be a rarity, an anachronical use of chariot capabilities.

By the way, I always enjoy visiting your blog, I love your miniatures.

Enric.

colin knight05 Feb 2016 8:42 a.m. PST

Thanks guys. I am happy to treat as heavy chariot for ease of rules to include all fighting capabilities. But it is good to have both mounted infantry and heavy chariot options in army list to allow choice/opinion. I imagine troops on less crowded carts would be able to shoot kneeling on the move. Who knows, they have been trained to do so.
My Blog has been great to share the hobby when gaming oppertunities are rare.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.