| Tango01 | 03 Feb 2016 3:21 p.m. PST |
Nice!
1/72.
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
| photocrinch | 03 Feb 2016 3:35 p.m. PST |
I prefer to think of it as a holy site for gatherings, not so much human sacrifice, but makes an engaging diorama I suppose. Love the moss on the rocks. |
| Cerdic | 03 Feb 2016 4:02 p.m. PST |
Pre-Roman Britain does seem to have been quite keen on ritual killing though! |
| Rogues1 | 03 Feb 2016 4:35 p.m. PST |
I thought I saw this in Spinal Tap… |
| skirmishcampaigns | 03 Feb 2016 8:42 p.m. PST |
|
| Buck215 | 03 Feb 2016 9:40 p.m. PST |
Oh, how they danced! The little people of Stonehenge. |
| jowady | 03 Feb 2016 9:58 p.m. PST |
Nice work but completely at odds with what Stonehenge actually was. |
| GurKhan | 04 Feb 2016 2:26 a.m. PST |
The bronze-armoured figure suggests that this intends to represent what Stonehenge may have been used for a thousand years or so after it was built, rather than what it "actually was". |
| Cerdic | 04 Feb 2016 4:34 a.m. PST |
I was under the impression that the finest minds in archaeology have no idea what Stonehenge actually was. Plenty of theories based on not much more than guesswork, though! Jowady, you have more information mate? |
| Dave Crowell | 04 Feb 2016 7:04 a.m. PST |
What Stonehenge actually was, and is for that matter, is a collection of large rocks that has stood in the English countryside for some five thousand years. During that time it has been used for many purposes by many people. |
| Tango01 | 04 Feb 2016 10:45 a.m. PST |
|
 Bobgnar  | 04 Feb 2016 11:51 a.m. PST |
According to recent program on the Smithsonian channel, the rocks were much much whiter originally and I have turned gray over much time. |
