Help support TMP


"My modern rule set experiment...." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Flames of War Message Board

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

15mm Trucks From Hell

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian struggles to complete his SISI truck force.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints the Brigadier

Adam8472 Fezian takes inspiration from Doctor Who.


Featured Profile Article

Ammunition Hill 1967

Ammunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,074 hits since 30 Jan 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP30 Jan 2016 7:34 p.m. PST

So I've been looking at Team Yankee and while it looks to be a hoot, I'd also like to do some more serious gaming of that period. I found a small scenario where a US company tries to hold off the tip of the Soviet spear. It plays on a 4x5 table and the force sizes are manageable. So I'm going to try it solo using different rule sets. The rules I'm going to use are:

  • Fistful of TOWs III
  • Team Yankee
  • 5Core Brigade Commander
  • Command Decision

I'll be asking for some advice from time to time and will post some thoughts here over the next few weeks.

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP30 Jan 2016 9:02 p.m. PST

Mark,

For what it's worth, if you're going to play a game of the size in your other two posts, you're going to want to use 5Core Company Command, not 5Core Brigade Commander. In 5CBC, the whole US force would be one stand of tanks with one M-113 attachment.

I'm on my phone so I don't know how to post a link, but if you go to blackhawkhet.blogspot.com and hit the tag for "Team Whiskey" you'll see a ten batrep campaign played out using 5Core Company Command.

If you've got a scenario with larger forces than described in the other two posts, I humbly apologize, please disregard.

V/R,
Jack

V/R,
Jack

Weasel30 Jan 2016 10:37 p.m. PST

I love this idea of doing the same scenario with different games. I did something like that way back but I never did write anything down.

BattlerBritain31 Jan 2016 5:37 a.m. PST

I'm having fun writing my own rules but pinching the best bits that I like from other rules and boardgames.

I'm using:


  • Air+Armor for the Operational Level tasking of formations (Regiments, Brigades etc)

  • FFOT3 for the anti-tank rules

  • Panzer Blitz for the anti-infantry rules

  • Battlefront WW2 for the Bn level morale checks

  • Some of my own bits to add a bit of variation

Seems to be working OK grin

Martin Rapier01 Feb 2016 6:43 a.m. PST

"I love this idea of doing the same scenario with different games. I did something like that way back but I never did write anything down."

I have a couple of standard scenarios I use for testing rule sets, specifically Bussaco for Napoleonics and Agira for WW2 operational (rather rather obscure division sized scrap in Sicily in 1943).

Not really settled on a single one for WW2 tactical, but I have a core of half a dozen I've tried with different sets of rules. As long as they include combined arms, engineering and attack/defence it covers most of the bases.

Leadgend01 Feb 2016 8:39 p.m. PST

Command Decision is also a higher level game, a company would be just a few stands.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.