Help support TMP


"Why no shoulder launched AA figures in 28mm" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:100 M-113s

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian shows off M-113s painted by Old Guard Painters.


Featured Workbench Article

Deconstructing a Toy Car

Sometimes, you have to take it apart, so you can put it back together again.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


745 hits since 30 Jan 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Vigilant30 Jan 2016 2:05 p.m. PST

The title says it all. When shoulder launched missiles have equipped most armies since the 70s, and form part of a platoon Toe, why arn't they part of anyone's range of Cold War figures?

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP30 Jan 2016 2:31 p.m. PST

I don't know which platoon to&e you're thinking of – they simply don't feature in a standard rifle platoon, which tends to be the basis for 28mm games.

FABET0130 Jan 2016 3:03 p.m. PST

Anti Aircraft assets are usually an attachment, not part of a Platoon TO&E or even an MTO&E. Even then they usually don't get distributed below the Battalion or Company level.

Are you thinking maybe of LAWS which (at least in theory) could be used against Helicopters?

Black Bull30 Jan 2016 3:12 p.m. PST

The old Mongrel line had a Stinger operator.

shaun from s and s models30 Jan 2016 3:13 p.m. PST

also sams are a bit out of range for 28mm games really unless you game in a barn

Vigilant30 Jan 2016 3:16 p.m. PST

They are part of a Russian platoon Toe, and I do know the difference between a LAW and an anti aircraft missile. On a company level game, such as Sabre Squadron there would be likely to be at least 1 attached to the company, hence the question. Most weapons have ranges greater than the average table, but we still field tanks and artillery. If there are rules to include aircraft then why not field the anti-air?

iceaxe30 Jan 2016 4:16 p.m. PST

Eureka's US & Russians have them, link

Chuckaroobob30 Jan 2016 10:45 p.m. PST

I have two 28mm afghanis with stingers, but I'm not sure which company. Could be TAG or Eureka.

Vigilant31 Jan 2016 6:08 a.m. PST

Thanks iceaxe, I'd missed the Eureka US troops, no Soviet missile there though sadly, especially given last year's great releases.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.