"Female Amazon warrior buried 2,500 years ago in Altai..." Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Prehistoric Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...
Featured Profile Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 09 Dec 2015 3:44 p.m. PST |
… Mountains was… male. "New DNA findings have altered the sex of one of most famous recent Siberian archeological finds of human remains. A Swiss taxidermy expert brought 'her' to life, recreating the 'virgin' warrior's looks from facial bones, and some observers commented on her distinctly masculine appearance. Yet archeologists and anthropologists believed she was not only female – and a pig-tailed teenager – but a member of an elite corps of warriors within the Pazyryk culture which suggested likenesses to the fabled Amazon warriors of known to the Greeks. Entombed next to a much older man – perhaps father and daughter? – the remains lay beside shields, battle axes, bows and arrowheads, while the warrior's physique indicated a skilled horse rider and archer. Cowrie shells, amulets for female fertility but exceptionally rare in Pazyryk burials, were a tell-tale sign that this was a young woman, but so were various adornments to the grave – for example, the 'coffin', the wooden pillow, the quiver, all smaller in comparison to usual male burials. In a singular honour, nine horses – four of them bridled – were buried with the skeleton, an escort to the afterlife. But a major revamping is now underway. New DNA analysis indicates unequivocally that the remains were male and not female…" Full article here link
Amicalement Armand |
goragrad | 09 Dec 2015 10:30 p.m. PST |
Interesting. Wonder how much the gender ID affected the original 'reconstruction?' Haven't researched it but would not be surprised if the thickness of flesh i various areas of the skull varied between men and women. Also amusing to see the commenters who didn't want to accept the DNA evidence that this wasn't an 'Amazon.' |
Tango01 | 10 Dec 2015 12:29 p.m. PST |
Glad you found it interesting my friend. Amicalement Armand |
Borathan | 10 Dec 2015 11:23 p.m. PST |
@goragrad, from my understanding, the reconstructions tend to use slightly different calculations for gender, not entirely sure about which ones, or if they would be noticeable, but there are differences there. |
goragrad | 11 Dec 2015 2:40 p.m. PST |
|
|