Help support TMP


"Hiker finds 1,200-year-old Viking sword" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Fighting 15's Teutonic Order Command 1410

Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Movie Review


1,064 hits since 26 Oct 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0126 Oct 2015 8:55 p.m. PST

""The sword was found in very good condition. It is very special to get into a sword that is merely lacking its grip," said Hordaland County, Norway, archeologist Jostein Aksdal. "When the snow has gone in spring, we will check the place where the sword was found. If we find several objects, or a tomb, perhaps we can find the story behind the sword. This was a common sword in western Norway, but it was a costly weapon, and the owner must have used it to show power."

He added it dates to about the year 750.

It was found in Haukeli, in central-southern Norway, by hiker Goran Olsen, who stopped for a rest and discovered it under some rocks along a well-traveled hiking path. The area is covered with frost and snow for six months of the year and features low humidity in the summer, contributing to the sword's preserved condition…"

picture

From here
link

Amicalement
Armand

wrgmr126 Oct 2015 10:26 p.m. PST

Single edge, interesting?

MajorB27 Oct 2015 2:19 a.m. PST

Way behind the times as usual:
TMP link

Zargon27 Oct 2015 9:03 a.m. PST

Looked at this because the title was interesting,yes awsome find, MB I did not look at the previous post because I was not interested in the title.
Cheers

MajorB28 Oct 2015 2:35 a.m. PST

I did not look at the previous post because I was not interested in the title.

Which only goes to show that titles (headlines) are important!

Tango0128 Oct 2015 10:37 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.