Help support TMP


"The Myths of Pearl Harbor " Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Media Message Board

Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:285th Scale Sturmoviks from C-in-C

Beowulf Fezian paints up some WWII Soviet aircraft.


Featured Profile Article

Axis & Allies at Gen Con

Paul Glasser reports from the A&A Miniatures tournament.


Current Poll


1,163 hits since 26 Oct 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0126 Oct 2015 3:49 p.m. PST

Of possible interest?

"Few events in the history of the United States have generated as much controversy as the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Rumors abounded during the war, and the release of the Congressional Investigation Report on July 26, 1946, while containing information that would scotch most of them, did not end the speculations. Part of the problem with the Pearl Harbor Attack Investigation Report (PHA for short) was that it was in 40 parts bound in about 23 volumes. Extracting the answers to the bizarre stories that ran rampant was a daunting task for even the most serious researcher.

Today, however, with the aid of computer searching, we can locate information about events and people that have been buried in stacks and university attics for decades. Of course, no one will be able to convince the die-hard Roosevelt-haters that he didn't arrange, or at least allow, the attack, but for those of us who simply want the answers to questions such as "Why didn't the Opana Point radar-contact report reach Adm. Kimmel?", the testimonies of the people involved will illuminate the situation in a most satifactory manner…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

klepley27 Oct 2015 8:01 a.m. PST

Don't ever let facts get in the way of conspiracy theorists. Takes all the fun out of living.

Tango0128 Oct 2015 10:39 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP30 Oct 2015 12:14 p.m. PST

I've always felt the notion of Roosevelt 'sacrificing' the Pacific Fleet to get us into the war was utter nonsense. ANY attack at all by Japan against the US--even an attack on an empty harbor--would have sufficed. Why lose the ships if it wasn't necessary?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.