"Hat or First to fight ?" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board Back to the 20mm WWII Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article A walk down memory lane - do you remember the Tank Trap?
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Continuing to research the Tunisian Campaign and my Uncle Jasper's service there.
|
| Guthroth | 17 Oct 2015 3:28 a.m. PST |
Whos 1/72 figs are better ? Do they mix well ? TIA |
| Texas Jack | 17 Oct 2015 5:00 a.m. PST |
I donīt know if you have already been there, but this site link will show you the size of the figures as well as the poses, and also allows for comparisons. |
| Umpapa | 17 Oct 2015 5:01 a.m. PST |
If You mean 1939 Poles, FtF are much better then HaT. Best 1939 Poles, for now.
They mix not so well. The size and style is simillar, but HaT Poles are much less detailed. FtF Poles are very simillar to Ceasar Miniatures. FtF Germans are historically very correct and quite simillar to HaT, and both are not the best Germans on the market…. |
| Who asked this joker | 17 Oct 2015 7:51 a.m. PST |
Definitely check out the site TJ linked. PSR is fabulous for all figures 1/72 scale in any era. Sometimes there is a side-by-side link to figures. The Poles for instance have such a link here. link Others are on the same page but the link has the anchor to the 2 Polish sets out right now. I think FtF matches quite well with HaT. Same size. Detail is a little soft on HaT but not overly so. YMMV John |
|
is excited to paint something new.