Help support TMP


"FNG M60 Allocation Question" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

20mm Army Dogs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally begins Vietnam.


Featured Profile Article

ISIS in the Year 2066

What if you want to game something too controversial or distasteful to put on the tabletop?


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


826 hits since 9 Oct 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

xxSepsisxx09 Oct 2015 7:35 p.m. PST

So I was setting up a game of FNG and for the US Army it lists the M60s as being in each squad when I thought there were 2 in a separate weapons squad, along with the apparently hardly ever used recoiless rifles. I know most of the time the weapon squad was broken up and given to rifle squads to keep them at strength. I was just thinking about setting up the squad as normal and then rolling for the M60s as attachments like the FOs and RTOs. I'm just curious how others do it, do any of you use them as attachments or even roll for a whole weapons squad.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP09 Oct 2015 8:08 p.m. PST

I go with actual practice – in the squad. I don't care what the TO&E says if no one does it that way.

raylev309 Oct 2015 8:46 p.m. PST

Even if the M60s were part of a weapons platoon/squad, they were attached to the squads for operations.

Mako1109 Oct 2015 11:31 p.m. PST

From what I've read, and seen posted here by others, some in response to my queries, two per platoon does seem to be the correct number.

However, given the usual GI ingenuity, I suspect more might have been scrounged from various sources, if WWIII really came to blows. Not sure that would be possible, but I'll bet a lot of people would have done what they could to strip them from jeeps, and/or to acquire them via other various means.

I think that is especially true, given the RRs were usually left back at base, during maneuvers, and/or various combat missions.

I'd be interested to see what others that served during the Cold War think of my hypothesis, and its feasibility.

I guess, if spare M60s weren't available, they might have broken out the BARs, M-14s, and/or other similar weapons, instead.

Depending upon the time period, some M16s were designated as "full-auto" rifles in the TO&Es too. Only one designated shooter for that per squad initially, IIRC, but that was later changed to one per fire team, so two to three per squad for the US Army and Marines, respectively, before they got the M240s and M249s.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP10 Oct 2015 3:53 a.m. PST

There are loads of Vietnam accounts (including from Baddawg, formerly of this Parish) of units disbanding the weapons squad, losing the recoilless rifle in a bush, begging, borrowing or stealing a third M60, and operating three straight sections with an M60 in each. Some units did stick to TO&E, but I suspect they were the exception rather than the rule.

Major Mike10 Oct 2015 6:54 a.m. PST

The RR was a pain to tote around as well as the rounds, but it could bust a wood and earth bunker. The Airborne used them into the 1980's. Doctrine said the 60's were to be used by the Platoon Leader to create a base of fire for the platoon to maneuver around. But, as others have mentioned they usually were attached to the squads. Often, while on the move, the 60 was the third soldier in the file to put heavy fire power up front if an ambush occurred and the point man had sniffed it out or triggered it. Each squad had an automatic rifleman. He carried an M-16 that also had a bi-pod and all of his magazines were suppose carry 30 rounds while the normal rifleman carried 20 round magazines. Other fun toys that were favored were sawed off M-79 grenade launchers loaded with an anti-personnel round carried by a point man. If he got off a shot he would then drop the 79 and start using his 16. Another fun one was a claymore mine fused with a very shot burn fuse. This was attached to your pack. If things got hot and you needed to beat feet, you could set the fuse and drop your pack and keep running. If the enemy was close behind, they would like to stop and see what you had dropped.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP10 Oct 2015 7:00 a.m. PST

My father once said the RR was pretty useless and that his company just left them on base. Scrounging an extra M60 was the order of the day…

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse10 Oct 2015 9:46 a.m. PST

When I commanded a Mech Co. '87-'89, each Squad of 11, had one M60… TMP link

Mako1110 Oct 2015 2:46 p.m. PST

Thanks for the info, MM, EC, and Legion 4.

That is very valuable.

I suspect in the European theater, if the Soviets had attacked with all that armor, those RRs would be a bit more valuable, but recall reading even there when on exercises, the guys would usually leave them back at base.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse10 Oct 2015 3:00 p.m. PST

In '88, our Bde CEs were still using the 90mm RR, IIRC …

trance12 Oct 2015 8:02 a.m. PST

The weapons squad contained 3 M67 90mm RR and 2 M60.
By the early 80s this changed to 3 M47 Dragon and 2 M60
The rifle squads had 1 M60 each. Thus of the 6 fire teams availible to a US LEG rifle Platoon 3 could have both a dragon and a M60 2 could have a M60 and 1 would have nothing but its personel weapons.
Me HHC 1/23 Infantry 81-82.

Lion in the Stars12 Oct 2015 7:29 p.m. PST

The Army actually broke the M67s back out of storage for Afghanistan, for troops to pack instead of Javelins. CLU plus one Javelin is 28.7kg, but the M67 gunner can pack two HEAT and one beehive round for the same overall weight.

Visceral Impact Studios13 Oct 2015 7:31 a.m. PST

I've been told by a Vietnam vet that on paper the M60s were in the weapons squad.

But he said that in practice they were either assigned directly to a rifle squad (e.g. during a patrol/movement when used as Major Mike described), placed by the LT when defending to cover key fields of fire, or led by the platoon sergeant to function as base of fire while the LT led the assault element (e.g. when approaching a village).

For game purposes then in something like FNG I'd let the player assign them as he sees fit.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.